Hang Qi created KAFKA-1475:
------------------------------

             Summary: Kafka consumer stops LeaderFinder/FetcherThreads, but 
application does not know
                 Key: KAFKA-1475
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1475
             Project: Kafka
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: clients, consumer
    Affects Versions: 0.8.0
         Environment: linux, rhel 6.4
            Reporter: Hang Qi
            Assignee: Neha Narkhede


We encounter an issue of consumers not consuming messages in production. ( this 
consumer has its own consumer group, and just consumes one topic, though 3 
partitions.)

Based on the logs, we have following findings:
1. Zookeeper session expires, kafka highlevel consumer detected this event, and 
released old broker parition ownership and re-register consumer.
2. Upon creating ephemeral path in Zookeeper, it found that the path still 
exists, and try to read the content of the node.
3. After read back the content, it founds the content is same as that it is 
going to write, so it logged as "[ZkClient-EventThread-428-ZK/kafka] 
(kafka.utils.ZkUtils$) - 
/consumers/consumerA/ids/consumerA-1400815740329-5055aeee exists with value { 
"pattern":"static", "subscription":{ "TOPIC": 1 }, "timestamp":"1400846114845", 
"version":1 } during connection loss; this is ok", and doing nothing.
4. After that, it throws exception indicated that the cause is 
"org.apache.zookeeper.KeeperException$NoNodeException: KeeperErrorCode = NoNode 
for /consumers/consumerA/ids/consumerA-1400815740329-5055aeee" during 
rebalance. 
5. After all retries failed, it gave up retry and left the LeaderFinderThread, 
FetcherThread stopped. 

Step 3 and 4 looks very weird, checking the code, there is timestamp contains 
in the stored data, it may be caused by Zookeeper issue.

But what I am wondering is that whether it possible to let application (kafka 
client users) to know that the underline LeaderFinderThread and FetcherThread 
are stopped, like allowing application to register some callback or throws some 
exception (by invalidate the KafkaStream iterator for example)? For me, it is 
not reasonable for the kafka client to shutdown everything and wait for next 
rebalance, and let application wait on iterator.hasNext() without knowing that 
there is something wrong underline.

I've read about twiki about kafka 0.9 consumer rewrite, and there is a 
ConsumerRebalanceCallback interface, but I am not sure how long it will take to 
be ready, and how long it will take for us to migrate. 

Please help to look at this issue.  Thanks very much!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to