Hi all, Thank you for your feedback. I have updated the KIP to incorporate it. I have changed the following:
* Added a few ideas in the future work section about metadata which could be added in the future. This strengthens the motivation of the KIP. * Added a section about the Metadata API to clean up the cluster authorized fields in the request/response. I think that the updated version should address all your comments. Please let me know if you have any further comments. I will start a vote later this week if I don't hear from you. Best, David On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:52 PM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > Thanks for the KIP. I agree with keeping it simple in the first iteration. > If we can include the authorized operations clean-up without too much > effort, that would be great. But if it increases the scope a lot, I'd punt > it to the future. > > Ismael > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 8:10 AM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to propose a small KIP: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-700%3A+Add+Describe+Cluster+API > > > > Please let me know what you think. > > > > Best, > > David > > >
