Thanks for the KIP! +1 (non-binding)
walker On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:40 AM Bruno Cadonna <br...@confluent.io> wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, John! > > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Bruno > > On 08.12.20 18:03, John Roesler wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > There hasn't been much discussion on KIP-695 so far, so I'd > > like to go ahead and call for a vote. > > > > As a reminder, the purpose of KIP-695 to improve on the > > "task idling" feature we introduced in KIP-353. This KIP > > will allow Streams to offer deterministic time semantics in > > join-type topologies. For example, it makes sure that > > when you join two topics, that we collate the topics by > > timestamp. That was always the intent with task idling (KIP- > > 353), but it turns out the previous mechanism couldn't > > provide the desired semantics. > > > > The details are here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/JSXZCQ > > > > Thanks, > > -John > > >
