As I mentioned in the KIP, this transformer is slightly different from the current MaskField SMT.
> Currently there exists a MaskField SMT but that would completely remove the > value by setting it to an equivalent null value. One problem with this would > be that you’d not be able to know in the case of say a password going through > the mask transform it would become "" which could mean that no password was > present in the message, or it was removed. However this hash transformer > would remove this ambiguity if that makes sense. The proposed hash functions > would be MD5, SHA1, SHA256. which are all supported via MessageDigest. Given this take on things do you still think there would be value in this smt? Brandon Brown > On Oct 15, 2020, at 12:36 PM, Ning Zhang <ning2008w...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, I think this SMT feature is parallel to > https://docs.confluent.io/current/connect/transforms/index.html > >> On 2020/10/15 15:24:51, Brandon Brown <bran...@bbrownsound.com> wrote: >> Bumping this thread. >> Please take a look at the KIP and vote or let me know if you have any >> feedback. >> >> KIP: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-665%3A+Kafka+Connect+Hash+SMT >> >> Proposed: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9057 >> >> Thanks >> >> Brandon Brown >> >>>> On Oct 8, 2020, at 10:30 PM, Brandon Brown <bran...@bbrownsound.com> wrote: >>> >>> Just wanted to give another bump on this and see if anyone had any >>> comments. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Brandon Brown >>> >>>> On Oct 1, 2020, at 9:11 AM, "bran...@bbrownsound.com" >>>> <bran...@bbrownsound.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey Kafka Developers, >>>> >>>> I’ve created the following KIP and updated it based on feedback from >>>> Mickael. I was wondering if we could get a vote on my proposal and move >>>> forward with the proposed pr. >>>> >>>> Thanks so much! >>>> -Brandon >>
