Thanks for driving this, Dongjin!

The KIP looks good to me. I’m +1 (non-binding).

Best,
David

Le mar. 6 oct. 2020 à 17:23, Dongjin Lee <dong...@apache.org> a écrit :

> As of present:
>
> - Binding: +2 (Gwen, John)
> - Non-binding: 0
>
> Thanks,
> Dongjin
>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 10:51 AM John Roesler <vvcep...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the KIP, Dongjin!
> >
> > I’ve just reviewed the KIP document, and it looks good to me.
> >
> > I’m +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > John
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020, at 19:11, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > A very welcome update :)
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 9:09 AM Dongjin Lee <dong...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi devs,
> > > >
> > > > Here I open the vote for KIP-653: Upgrade log4j to log4j2. It
> replaces
> > the
> > > > obsolete log4j logging library into the current standard, log4j2,
> with
> > > > maintaining backward-compatibility.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Dongjin
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Dongjin Lee*
> > > >
> > > > *A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *github:  <http://goog_969573159/>github.com/dongjinleekr
> > > > <https://github.com/dongjinleekr>keybase:
> > https://keybase.io/dongjinleekr
> > > > <https://keybase.io/dongjinleekr>linkedin:
> > kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
> > > > <https://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>speakerdeck:
> > speakerdeck.com/dongjin
> > > > <https://speakerdeck.com/dongjin>*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Gwen Shapira
> > > Engineering Manager | Confluent
> > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > > Follow us: Twitter | blog
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> *Dongjin Lee*
>
> *A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.*
>
>
>
>
> *github:  <http://goog_969573159/>github.com/dongjinleekr
> <https://github.com/dongjinleekr>keybase: https://keybase.io/dongjinleekr
> <https://keybase.io/dongjinleekr>linkedin: kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
> <https://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>speakerdeck:
> speakerdeck.com/dongjin
> <https://speakerdeck.com/dongjin>*
>

Reply via email to