> do we just suggest they no longer have any production use case? yep
> KafkaProducer internal only. Do we also want to deprecate this public API as > well? We have to make sure users' code can keep working beyond recompilation when migrating to "next" release. Hence, deprecation cycle is necessary. On 2020/07/07 06:52:25, Boyang Chen <reluctanthero...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the KIP. One question I have is that when we refer to the two > methods as useless, do we just suggest they no longer have any production > use case? If this is the case, Producer#addSerializerToConfig(Map<String, > Object> configs, keySerializer, valueSerializer) is only used in > KafkaProducer internal only. Do we also want to deprecate this public API > as well? > > Boyang > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 11:36 PM Manikumar <manikumar.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks for the KIP. > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 11:43 PM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Yes, it does. > > > > > > I guess many people are busy wrapping up 2.6 release. Today is code > > freeze. > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > On 6/10/20 12:11 AM, Chia-Ping Tsai wrote: > > > > hi Matthias, > > > > > > > > Does this straightforward KIP still need 3 votes? > > > > > > > > On 2020/06/05 21:27:52, "Matthias J. Sax" <mj...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> +1 (binding) > > > >> > > > >> Thanks for the KIP! > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -Matthias > > > >> > > > >> On 6/4/20 11:25 PM, Chia-Ping Tsai wrote: > > > >>> hi All, > > > >>> > > > >>> I would like to start the vote on KIP-620: > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=155749118 > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> Chia-Ping > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
