Thank you for the KIP. I sincerely hope we get enough votes on this KIP. I
was thinking of similar changes while working on DR capabilities and
offsets are Achilles Heels and this KIP addresses it.

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 6:10 PM Maulin Vasavada <maulin.vasav...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:41 AM Ryanne Dolan <ryannedo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Bump. Looks like we've got 6 non-binding votes and 1 binding.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:25 AM Ning Zhang <ning2008w...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello committers,
>> >
>> > I am the author of the KIP-545 and if we still miss votes from the
>> > committers, please review the KIP and vote for it, so that the
>> > corresponding PR will be reviewed soon.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0
>> >
>> > Thank you
>> >
>> > On 2020/02/06 17:05:41, Edoardo Comar <edoardli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > +1 (non-binding)
>> > > thanks for the KIP !
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 13:57, Navinder Brar <navinder_b...@yahoo.com
>> > .invalid>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > +1 (non-binding)
>> > > > Navinder
>> > > >     On Tuesday, 14 January, 2020, 07:24:02 pm IST, Ryanne Dolan <
>> > > > ryannedo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >  Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote.
>> > > >
>> > > > Ryanne
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 1:44 AM Tom Bentley <tbent...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield <
>> > > > > andrew_schofi...@live.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" <
>> mickael.mai...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >    +1 (binding)
>> > > > > >    Thanks for the KIP!
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >    On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan <
>> > ryannedo...@gmail.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >    >
>> > > > > >    > Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far.
>> > > > > >    >
>> > > > > >    > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang <
>> > > > ning2008w...@gmail.com
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >    >
>> > > > > >    > > My current plan is to implement this in
>> > "MirrorCheckpointTask"
>> > > > > >    > >
>> > > > > >    > > On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai <snow4yo...@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >    > > > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ?
>> > right?
>> > > > > >    > > >
>> > > > > >    > > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan <
>> > > > > > ryannedo...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >    > > wrote:
>> > > > > >    > > >
>> > > > > >    > > > > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the
>> > vote for
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > >    > > following
>> > > > > >    > > > > small KIP:
>> > > > > >    > > > >
>> > > > > >    > > > >
>> > > > > >    > > > >
>> > > > > >    > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0
>> > > > > >    > > > >
>> > > > > >    > > > > This is an elegant way to automatically write
>> consumer
>> > group
>> > > > > > offsets to
>> > > > > >    > > > > downstream clusters without breaking existing use
>> cases.
>> > > > > > Currently, we
>> > > > > >    > > rely
>> > > > > >    > > > > on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and
>> > > > > >    > > kafka-consumer-groups
>> > > > > >    > > > > command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this
>> > functionality
>> > > > > > into MM2
>> > > > > >    > > > > itself, reducing the effort required to
>> > failover/failback
>> > > > > > workloads
>> > > > > >    > > between
>> > > > > >    > > > > clusters.
>> > > > > >    > > > >
>> > > > > >    > > > > Thanks for the votes!
>> > > > > >    > > > >
>> > > > > >    > > > > Ryanne
>> > > > > >    > > > >
>> > > > > >    > > >
>> > > > > >    > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to