We can conclude the vote on this: the KIP passes with three +1 (binding) votes from Guzhang, Bill, and John.
Thanks all for the great discussion and feedback! On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 3:34 PM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, I'm a +1 (binding) on the proposal. > > -Bill > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 3:02 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 on the updated proposal. Thanks Sophie. > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:51 AM John Roesler <vvcep...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, Sophie. > > > > > > I'm +1 (binding) on the current proposal. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -John > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020, at 19:45, Guozhang Wang wrote: > > > > Hi Sophie, > > > > > > > > Sorry I was a bit late on following up the DISCUSS thread. I still > have > > > > some comment about the processor-node level metrics and left a reply > on > > > > that thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > Guozhang > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 2:34 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman < > > sop...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > > > I think we've reached a general consensus on all the > > non-implementation > > > > > details of KIP-613 so I'd like to call for a vote. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-613%3A+Add+end-to-end+latency+metrics+to+Streams > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > Sophie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -- Guozhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -- Guozhang > > >
