+1 (binding) This will be a nice improvement. From the discussion thread it's clear this is tricky to get right, nice work!
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 8:16 AM Andrew Schofield <andrew_schofi...@live.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > This is now looking very nice. > > Andrew Schofield > > On 19/05/2020, 16:11, "Randall Hauch" <rha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you, Aakash, for putting together this KIP and shepherding the > discussion. Also, many thanks to all those that participated in the > very > active discussion. I'm actually very happy with the current proposal, > am > confident that it is a valuable improvement to the Connect framework, > and > know that it will be instrumental in making sink tasks easily able to > report problematic records and keep running. > > +1 (binding) > > Best regards, > > Randall > > On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 6:59 PM Aakash Shah <as...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I'd like to open a vote for KIP-610: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-610%3A+Error+Reporting+in+Sink+Connectors > > > > Thanks, > > Aakash > > > >
