Thanks for the KIP Tom, this will be a useful addition. +1(binding)
-Bill On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 1:14 PM Tom Bentley <tbent...@redhat.com> wrote: > It would be nice to get this into Kafka 2.6. There are 2 binding and 3 > non-binding votes so far. If you've not looked at it already now would be a > great time! > > Many thanks, > > Tom > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 1:27 PM Mickael Maison <mickael.mai...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks Tom for leading this KIP and steering the syntax discussion > > towards a consensus > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:29 AM Edoardo Comar <eco...@uk.ibm.com> > wrote: > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > Thanks Tom > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Edoardo Comar > > > > > > Event Streams for IBM Cloud > > > IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Gunnar Morling <gun...@hibernate.org> > > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > > Date: 19/05/2020 10:35 > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] KIP 585: Filter and conditional > > SMTs > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Thanks for working on this, Tom! This KIP will be very useful for > > > connectors like Debezium. > > > > > > --Gunnar > > > > > > Am Fr., 15. Mai 2020 um 20:02 Uhr schrieb Konstantine Karantasis > > > <konstant...@confluent.io>: > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > Thanks Tom. > > > > > > > > Konstantine > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 5:03 AM Andrew Schofield > > > <andrew_schofi...@live.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP. This will be very useful. > > > > > > > > > > Andrew Schofield > > > > > > > > > > On 13/05/2020, 10:14, "Tom Bentley" <tbent...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-585: Filter and conditional > SMTs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.apache.org_confluence_display_KAFKA_KIP-2D585-253A-2BFilter-2Band-2BConditional-2BSMTs&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=EzRhmSah4IHsUZVekRUIINhltZK7U0OaeRo7hgW4_tQ&m=AnNSwofDk0eZPfkUhSGAHsEyMB_tKe1luK9nox7bE1w&s=_AHSlXsBMSSSOnVL3bBa-Pzu9Zg1f8lgOSTI_VMTP8s&e= > > > > > > > > > > > > > Those involved in the discussion seem to be positively disposed > > to > > > the > > > > > idea, but in the absence of any committer participation it's > been > > > > > difficult > > > > > to find a consensus on how these things should be configured. > > > What's > > > > > presented here seemed to be the option which people preferred > > > overall. > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unless stated otherwise above: > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with > number > > > 741598. > > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 > > 3AU > > > > > > > >
