Makes sense to allow users to comply with their requirements without taking
on the maintenance cost of keeping up with new headers across different
versions.
Thanks for the KIP Jeff.

+1 (binding)

Konstantine

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:13 AM Manikumar <manikumar.re...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP.
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 7:57 PM Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for putting this together.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 2:02 PM Aneel Nazareth <an...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Jeff, this seems like it addresses a user need.
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 1:28 PM Zhiguo Huang <jeff.hu...@confluent.io>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks to everyone for their input. I've incorporated the changes,
> and
> > I
> > > > think this is ready for voting.
> > > >
> > > > To summarize, the KIP simply proposes to add a feature which allows
> > HTTP
> > > > response headers configured for Kafka Connect.The KIP can be found
> > here:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+577%3A+Allow+HTTP+Response+Headers+to+be+Configured+for+Kafka+Connect
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Jeff.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to