Thanks for the update, Levani!
-John

On Sat, Apr 4, 2020, at 04:36, Levani Kokhreidze wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Small update regarding this KIP. As per John’s suggestion during the 
> code review 
> (https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/7170#discussion_r392608571 
> <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/7170#discussion_r392608571>) 
> we’ve decided to remove KeyValueMapper overloads for the new 
> `repartition` operation for the first release of this feature.
> Wiki page has been updated accordingly 
> (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-221%3A+Enhance+DSL+with+Connecting+Topic+Creation+and+Repartition+Hint
>  
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-221:+Enhance+DSL+with+Connecting+Topic+Creation+and+Repartition+Hint>)
> 
> Regards,
> Levani
> 
> > On Aug 1, 2019, at 9:55 AM, Levani Kokhreidze <levani.co...@gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Thank you all!
> > 
> > The vote has been open for ~8 days. KIP has three binding votes (Bill, 
> > Guozhang, Matthias) and one non-binding (Sophie) so the KIP vote passes!
> > I’ll mark KIP as accepted and start working on it as soon as possible!
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Levani
> > 
> >> On Aug 1, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >> 
> >> +1 (binding)
> >> 
> >> On 7/31/19 8:36 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> >>> Thanks for the update! +1 (binding).
> >>> 
> >>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:42 PM Levani Kokhreidze 
> >>> <levani.co...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> Hello Guozhang,
> >>>> 
> >>>> Thanks for the feedback. That’s an interesting point. To be honest, I
> >>>> totally missed it. I wasn’t aware that there’s `groupBy` possibility on
> >>>> KTable.
> >>>> I don’t see any reasons why not to add same functionality to KTable
> >>>> interface.
> >>>> 
> >>>> I’ve updated the KIP:
> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-221%3A+Enhance+DSL+with+Connecting+Topic+Creation+and+Repartition+Hint
> >>>> <
> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-221:+Enhance+DSL+with+Connecting+Topic+Creation+and+Repartition+Hint
> >>>>> 
> >>>> Please let me know if you have any other questions and/or concerns.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Levani
> >>>> 
> >>>>> On Jul 31, 2019, at 1:24 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Hello Levani,
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Thanks for the KIP! Just got a quick question here about the scope: why
> >>>> do
> >>>>> we only want this for `KStream`, not `KTable#groupBy` for example?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Guozhang
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:27 PM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> Thanks for the KIP Levani.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> -Bill
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 3:37 PM Levani Kokhreidze <
> >>>> levani.co...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Still waiting for feedback on this KIP.
> >>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any concerns and/or questions.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>> Levani
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> On Jul 24, 2019, at 8:20 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman <sop...@confluent.io
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> Looks good! Thanks Levani,
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> Sophie
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 2:16 PM Levani Kokhreidze <
> >>>>>>> levani.co...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> I’d like to initialize voting on KIP-221:
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-221%3A+Enhance+KStream+with+Connecting+Topic+Creation+and+Repartition+Hint
> >>>>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-221:+Enhance+KStream+with+Connecting+Topic+Creation+and+Repartition+Hint
> >>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> If there’re any more concerns about the KIP, happy to discuss
> >>>> further.
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>> Levani
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> -- Guozhang
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >> 
> > 
> 
>

Reply via email to