Hi Konstantine, Thanks for the feedback, I have addressed it on the [DISCUSS] thread and will update the KIP shortly.
Thanks, Sanjana On Mar 25, 2020, 10:52 AM -0700, Konstantine Karantasis <konstant...@confluent.io>, wrote: > Hi Sanjana. > Thanks for the KIP! Seems quite useful not to overwhelm the brokers with > the described requests from clients. > > You have the votes already, and I'm also in favor overall, but I've made a > couple of questions (sorry for the delay) regarding Connect, which is also > using retry.backoff.ms but currently is not mentioned in the KIP, as well > as a question around how we expect the new setting to work with rebalances > in clients that inherit from the AbstractCoordinator (Consumer and Connect > at a minimum). > > Maybe it's worth clarifying these points in the KIP, or the mailing list > thread in case I missed something w/r/t the intent of the changes. > > Best, > Konstantine > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 9:42 PM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks for the KIP, great improvement! > > > > Le mer. 25 mars 2020 à 04:44, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> a écrit : > > > > > +1 (binding) - thank you > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020, 10:50 AM Sanjana Kaundinya <skaundi...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > > > I’d like to start a vote for KIP-580: Exponential Backoff for Kafka > > > > Clients. The link to the KIP can be found here: > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-580%3A+Exponential+Backoff+for+Kafka+Clients > > > > . > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Sanjana > > > > > > > > > > > > >
