-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20616/#review41250
-----------------------------------------------------------



core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/Log.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20616/#comment74690>

    We probably should use validMessages here.



core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/Log.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20616/#comment74688>

    The comment needs to be updated.



core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/Log.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20616/#comment74687>

    Could this be changed to validBytes too?



core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/Log.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20616/#comment74689>

    This requires computing the checksum and can be expensive. We probably 
should move it to after the message size check.


- Jun Rao


On April 23, 2014, 10:20 p.m., Guozhang Wang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/20616/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 23, 2014, 10:20 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1409
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1409
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fix KAFKA-1409: Address Jun's comments round two
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/cluster/Partition.scala 
> c08eab0bc35aa2b0caa0dfc1987b4face4315d3b 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/Log.scala 
> 46df8d99d977a3b010a9b9f4698187fa9bfb2498 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/message/MessageSet.scala 
> a1b5c63b4d9deaa2556427d995c41841838cf581 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/KafkaApis.scala 
> bb0359d933356b8fcc2c8df22ce6ea9cb838d6a2 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/KafkaRequestHandler.scala 
> f11f6e2c82b016f4dd3e92466ae1d2ede19feb30 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20616/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Guozhang Wang
> 
>

Reply via email to