Hey Rangan, thanks for the interest! In fact we are still in the design phase, and need more supporting use cases that requires a higher scaling factor than number of partitions. It would be good if you could share some of your needed use case when the unit time of processing one record is the bottleneck, or some cost wise concern of over-partitioning.
Boyang On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 10:44 AM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > cc @Boyang Chen <bche...@outlook.com> who authored this draft. > > > Guozhang > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 10:29 AM Rangan Prabhakaran (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A) > < > kprabhaka...@bloomberg.net> wrote: > > > Hi, > > A few of us have been following KIP-X. We are interested in the roadmap / > > plan there and would like to contribute towards the same. > > > > What are the next steps to discuss / iterate on this KIP ? Currently, its > > in draft state and there does not seem to be a discussion thread attached > > yet. > > > > KIP - > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-X%3A+Introduce+a+cooperative+consumer+processing+semantic > > > > Thanks > > Rangan > > > > -- > -- Guozhang >
