Thanks to everyone for voting. The KIP-216 has been accepted, with 3 binding votes from Bill, John and Matthias and 1 non-binding votes.
--- Vito On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 1:46 PM Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > -Matthias > > On 1/17/20 9:35 PM, John Roesler wrote: > > Thanks for the KIP! > > > > I'm +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks, > > -John > > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, at 08:46, Bill Bejeck wrote: > >> Thanks for the KIP. > >> > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> -Bill > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 9:41 AM Navinder Brar > >> <navinder_b...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 (non-binding) With a small comment which was mentioned by Vinoth as > >>> well. Did we fix on the flag for StreamsRebalancingException, I don't > see > >>> it in the KIP. > >>> -Navinder > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tuesday, 14 January, 2020, 08:00:11 pm IST, Vito Jeng < > >>> v...@is-land.com.tw> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, all, > >>> > >>> I would like to start the vote for KIP-216. > >>> > >>> Currently, IQ throws InvalidStateStoreException for any types of error. > >>> With this KIP, user can distinguish different types of error. > >>> > >>> KIP is here: > >>> > >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-216%3A+IQ+should+throw+different+exceptions+for+different+errors > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> --- > >>> Vito > >>> -- > >>> > >>> > >>> --- > >>> Vito > >>> > >> > >
