Hello, Rajini.

Yes, we can!

I have to write another KIP that goal will be keep only TLSv1.2 and TLSv1.3 in 
SslConfigs.DEFAULT_SSL_ENABLED_PROTOCOLS
Is it correct?


> 17 янв. 2020 г., в 14:13, Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com> написал(а):
> 
> Hi Nikolay,
> 
> Can we split this KIP into two:
> 1) Remove insecure TLS protocols from the default values
> 2) Enable TLSv1.3
> 
> Since we are coming up to KIP freeze for 2.5.0 release, it will be good if
> we can get at least the first one into 2.5.0. It would be a much smaller
> change and won't get blocked behind TLSv1.3 testing.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Rajini
> 
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:49 AM Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Nikolay,
>> 
>> There a couple of things you could do:
>> 
>> 1) Run all system tests that use SSL with TLSv1.3. I had run a subset, but
>> it will be good to run all of them. You can do this locally using docker
>> with JDK 11 by updating the files in tests/docker. You will need to update
>> tests/kafkatest/services/security/security_config.py to enable only
>> TLSv1.3. Instructions for running system tests using docker are in
>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/trunk/tests/README.md.
>> 2) For integration tests, we run a small number of tests using TLSv1.3 if
>> the tests are run using JDK 11 and above. We need to do this for system
>> tests as well. There is an open JIRA:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9319. Feel free to assign
>> this to yourself if you have time to do this.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Rajini
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:15 AM Николай Ижиков <nizhi...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello, Rajini.
>>> 
>>> Can you, please, clarify, what should be done?
>>> I can try to do tests by myself.
>>> 
>>>> 6 янв. 2020 г., в 21:29, Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com>
>>> написал(а):
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Brajesh.
>>>> 
>>>> No one is working on this yet, but will follow up with the Confluent
>>> tools
>>>> team to see when this can be done.
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 3:29 PM Brajesh Kumar <kbrajesh...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello Rajini,
>>>>> 
>>>>> What is the plan to run system tests using JDK 11? Is someone working
>>> on
>>>>> this?
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 3:00 PM Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com
>>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Nikolay,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We can leave the KIP open and restart the discussion once system tests
>>>>> are
>>>>>> running.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Rajini
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 2:46 PM Николай Ижиков <nizhi...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hello, Rajini.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks, for the feedback.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Should I mark this KIP as declined?
>>>>>>> Or just wait for the system tests results?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 6 янв. 2020 г., в 17:26, Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi Nikolay,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the KIP. We currently run system tests using JDK 8 and
>>>>> hence
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> don't yet have full system test results with TLS 1.3 which requires
>>>>> JDK
>>>>>>> 11.
>>>>>>>> We should wait until that is done before enabling TLS1.3 by default.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Rajini
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 5:36 AM Николай Ижиков <nizhi...@apache.org
>>>> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hello, Team.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Any feedback on this KIP?
>>>>>>>>> Do we need this in Kafka?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 24 дек. 2019 г., в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to start a discussion of KIP.
>>>>>>>>>> Its goal is to enable TLSv1.3 and disable obsolete versions by
>>>>>> default.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=142641956
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Your comments and suggestions are welcome.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Brajesh Kumar
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 

Reply via email to