Hi Viktor,

I’m starting to wonder what exactly “duplicate” means in this context. Can you 
elaborate?

In case it helps, with your window definition, if I send a record with 
timestamp 20, it would actually belong to three different windows:
[0,30)
[10,40)
[20,50)

Because of this, you would (correctly) see three output records for that one 
input, but the outputs wouldn’t be “duplicates” properly, because they’d have 
different keys:

Input:
Key1: Val1 @ timestamp:20

Output:
Windowed<Window(0,30),Key1>: 1
Windowed<Window(10,40),Key1>: 1
Windowed<Window(20,50),Key1>: 1

Any chance that explains your observation?

Thanks,
John



On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, at 10:18, Viktor Markvardt wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> Thanks for answering my questions!
> I observe behavior which I can not understand.
> The code is working, but when delay between records larger then window
> duration I receive duplicated records.
> With the code below I received duplicated records in the output kstream.
> Count of duplicate records is always 3. If I change duration/advanceBy
> count of duplicated records is changing also.
> Do you have any ideas why duplicated records are received in the output
> kstream?
> 
> KStream<String, String> windowedStream = source
>     .groupByKey()
>     
> .windowedBy(TimeWindows.of(Duration.ofSeconds(30)).grace(Duration.ZERO).advanceBy(Duration.ofSeconds(10)))
>     .count()
>     
> .suppress(Suppressed.untilWindowCloses(Suppressed.BufferConfig.unbounded()))
>     .toStream();
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Viktor Markvardt
> 
> чт, 16 янв. 2020 г. в 04:59, John Roesler <vvcep...@apache.org>:
> 
> > Hi Viktor,
> >
> > I’m not sure why you get two identical outputs in response to a single
> > record. Regardless, since you say that you want to get a single, final
> > result for the window and you expect multiple inputs to the windows, you
> > need Suppression.
> >
> > My guess is that you just sent one record to try it out and didn’t see any
> > output? This is expected. Just as the window boundaries are defined by the
> > time stamps of the records, not by the current system time, suppression is
> > governed by the timestamp of the records. I.e., a thirty-second window is
> > not actually closed until you see a new record with a timestamp thirty
> > seconds later.
> >
> >  Maybe try just sending a sequence of updates with incrementing
> > timestamps. If the first record has timestamp T, then you should see an
> > output when you pass in a record with timestamp T+30.
> >
> > Important note: there is a built-in grace period that delays the output of
> > final results after the window ends. For complicated reasons, the default
> > is 24 hours! So you would actually not see an output until you send a
> > record with timestamp T+30+(24 hours) ! I strongly recommend you set the
> > grace period on TimeWindows to zero for your testing. You can increase it
> > later if you want to tolerate some late-arriving records.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -John
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020, at 10:41, Viktor Markvardt wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > My name is Viktor. I'm currently working with Kafka streams and have
> > > several questions about Kafka and I can not find answers in the official
> > > docs.
> > >
> > > 1. Why suppress functionality does not work with Hopping windows? How to
> > > make it work?
> > >
> > > Example of the code:
> > >
> > > KStream<String, String> finalStream = source
> > >                 .groupByKey()
> > >
> > >
> > .windowedBy(TimeWindows.of(Duration.ofSeconds(30)).advanceBy(Duration.ofSeconds(10)))
> > >                 .reduce((aggValue, newValue) -> newValue,
> > > Materialized.with(Serdes.String(), Serdes.String()))
> > >
> > >
> > .suppress(Suppressed.untilWindowCloses(Suppressed.BufferConfig.unbounded()))
> > >                 .toStream();
> > >
> > > finalStream.print(Printed.toSysOut());
> > > finalStream.to(outputTopic);
> > >
> > > After I run the code above - output stream is empty. There were no
> > > errors/exceptions.
> > > NOTE: With Tumbling Window the code working as expected.
> > > Maybe I simply use it incorrectly?
> > >
> > > 2. Why with Hopping windows (without suppress) there are duplicates in
> > the
> > > output stream?
> > > E.g., I send one record in the input kstream with Hopping window
> > > (duration=30s, advanceBy=2s) but get two same records (duplicate) in the
> > > output kstream.
> > > Is that an expected behavior? If so, how can I filter/switch off these
> > > duplicates?
> > >
> > > 3. Mainly I'm trying to solve this problem:
> > > I have kstream with events inside and events can be repeated
> > (duplicates).
> > > In the output kstream I would like to receive only unique events for the
> > > last 24 hours (window duration) with 1 hour window overlay (window
> > > advanceBy).
> > > Could you recommend me any examples of code or docs please?
> > > I have already read official docs and examples but it was not enough to
> > get
> > > full understanding of how I can achieve this.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Viktor Markvardt
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to