This seems not very controversial, so I will go ahead and move to a vote in the next couple days.
Thanks, Jason On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 10:23 AM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote: > Hey Colin, > > Thanks for the suggestions. I've clarified the use of the API overrides > and the request timeout. > > I think exponential backoff is a great idea. Can we do a separate KIP for > this? I think we can add it to the consumer and producer at the same time. > > -Jason > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 2:01 PM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > >> Thanks for the KIP, this makes sense to me. It will be good to align the >> AdminClient better with the consumer and producer when it comes to >> timeouts. >> >> Ismael >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 12:06 PM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi All, >> > >> > I wrote a short KIP to address a longstanding issue with timeout >> behavior >> > in the AdminClient: >> > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-533%3A+Add+default+api+timeout+to+AdminClient >> > . >> > >> > Take a look and let me know what you think. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Jason >> > >> >
