Thanks, Mickael!

Anyone else get a chance to validate the 2.2.2 RC2 build? It'd be great to
get this out the door.

Randall

On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 6:34 AM Mickael Maison <mickael.mai...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 (non binding)
> I verified signatures, built it from source, ran unit tests and quickstart
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 3:10 PM Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello all, we identified around three dozen bug fixes, including an
> update
> > of a third party dependency, and wanted to release a patch release for
> the
> > Apache Kafka 2.2.0 release.
> >
> > This is the *second* candidate for release of Apache Kafka 2.2.2. (RC1
> did
> > not include a fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9053,
> but
> > the fix appeared before RC1 was announced so it was easier to just create
> > RC2.)
> >
> > Check out the release notes for a complete list of the changes in this
> > release candidate:
> > https://home.apache.org/~rhauch/kafka-2.2.2-rc2/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> >
> > *** Please download, test and vote by Wednesday, October 30, 9am PT>
> >
> > Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > https://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
> >
> > * Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary):
> > https://home.apache.org/~rhauch/kafka-2.2.2-rc2/
> >
> > * Maven artifacts to be voted upon:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/kafka/
> >
> > * Javadoc:
> > https://home.apache.org/~rhauch/kafka-2.2.2-rc2/javadoc/
> >
> > * Tag to be voted upon (off 2.2 branch) is the 2.2.2 tag:
> > https://github.com/apache/kafka/releases/tag/2.2.2-rc2
> >
> > * Documentation:
> > https://kafka.apache.org/22/documentation.html
> >
> > * Protocol:
> > https://kafka.apache.org/22/protocol.html
> >
> > * Successful Jenkins builds for the 2.2 branch:
> > Unit/integration tests: https://builds.apache.org/job/kafka-2.2-jdk8/1/
> > System tests:
> > https://jenkins.confluent.io/job/system-test-kafka/job/2.2/216/
> >
> > /**************************************
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Randall Hauch
>

Reply via email to