Hi David,

Probably not a blocker, but I noticed the authorization section in the
security docs was not updated in 2.3.0 to include authorization
details for ElectPreferredLeaders and IncrementalAlterConfigs.
I just opened a PR to address that in 2.3:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/7508 (and also another PR for
2.4/trunk: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/7509)

On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 4:59 PM Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> David,
>
> Why do we have two site-doc packages, one for each Scala version? It
> is just HTML, right? IIRC, in previous releases we only packaged the
> docs once?
>
> Gwen
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 6:52 PM David Arthur <mum...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello all, we identified a few bugs and a dependency update we wanted to
> > get fixed for 2.3.1. In particular, there was a problem with rolling
> > upgrades of streams applications (KAFKA-8649).
> >
> > Check out the release notes for a complete list.
> > https://home.apache.org/~davidarthur/kafka-2.3.1-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> >
> > *** Please download, test and vote by Wednesday October 9th, 9pm PST
> >
> > Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > https://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
> >
> > * Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary):
> > https://home.apache.org/~davidarthur/kafka-2.3.1-rc1/
> >
> > * Maven artifacts to be voted upon:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/kafka/
> >
> > * Javadoc:
> > https://home.apache.org/~davidarthur/kafka-2.3.1-rc1/javadoc/
> >
> > * Tag to be voted upon (off 2.3 branch) is the 2.3.1 tag:
> > https://github.com/apache/kafka/releases/tag/2.3.1-rc1
> >
> > * Documentation:
> > https://kafka.apache.org/23/documentation.html
> >
> > * Protocol:
> > https://kafka.apache.org/23/protocol.html
> >
> > * Successful Jenkins builds for the 2.3 branch are TBD but will be located:
> >
> > Unit/integration tests: https://builds.apache.org/job/kafka-2.3-jdk8/
> >
> > System tests: https://jenkins.confluent.io/job/system-test-kafka/job/2.3/
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> > David Arthur

Reply via email to