`groud.instance.id` is for static group membership. What advantage to you imply by re-using it for (Cooperative)StickyAssignor?
>> As far as I understand this would make the behavior of those assignors more >> predictable. Can you elaborate? I am not aware of any re-use, and I personally believe, that config parameters should have a single purpose and should not be overloaded. Also note, if you set `group.instance.id` you opt-in to (ie, enable) static group membership. Hence, if your intent it to use it for regular re-balancing, that won't work. What issue do you see with current (Cooperative)StickyAssignor that you try to address? -Matthias On 10/7/19 3:13 AM, Georg Friedrich wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wondering whether it is planned to make use of the group.instance.id also > in the (Cooperative)StickyAssignor. > As far as I understand this would make the behavior of those assignors more > predictable. > Maybe you have some information on this or whether I should open a > Jira-Ticket for it. > Thanks in advance! > > Kind regards, > Georg Friedrich >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
