-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19831/#review39169
-----------------------------------------------------------


Could metadata.fetch.backoff.ms and retry.backoff.ms be merged into one 
property?


clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/ProducerConfig.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19831/#comment71529>

    Is the java variable name part of the public API too?



clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/ProducerConfig.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19831/#comment71530>

    We probably can include sth like "make sure that at least one of the 
brokers in the bootstrap list is accessible".



clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/ProducerConfig.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19831/#comment71535>

    leadership changes => partition leadership changes



clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/ProducerConfig.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19831/#comment71531>

    It's probably clearer if we change "The number of acknowledgements" to "The 
number of acknowledgements from the replicas"



clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/ProducerConfig.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19831/#comment71533>

    ellipses => elapses 



clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/ProducerConfig.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19831/#comment71532>

    We probably should mention that higher linger time improves throughput, but 
increases latency.



clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/ProducerConfig.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19831/#comment71534>

    Could we specify what exception will be thrown if the setting is false?



clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/ProducerConfig.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19831/#comment71536>

    It seems that we always include the built-in JmxReporter. So, we should 
mention this is the additional list of reporters that one can specify.


- Jun Rao


On March 30, 2014, 6:48 p.m., Jay Kreps wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/19831/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 30, 2014, 6:48 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1337
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1337
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> KAFKA-1337 Rationalize the producer configs.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/KafkaProducer.java 
> 8c1c5751a9186e6bc3196d152e4c3e948cc34b39 
>   clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/ProducerConfig.java 
> 259c14bd072a18c8e6a6b851db9fb8131da7426c 
>   
> clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/tools/ProducerPerformance.java 
> 3b3fb2c36fc45cc24da5008141310019befb05a9 
>   clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/config/AbstractConfig.java 
> 84a327e8c1f06840492abc38e5cb0446cfbc7541 
>   clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/config/ConfigDef.java 
> 67b349dc8d840b0b7bfb4bedde819e092dc48d21 
>   clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/metrics/JmxReporter.java 
> 3950eb13d37e41276db9b4d2db24c2b1f4118fc2 
>   clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/metrics/MetricsReporter.java 
> 2c395b1f8f3434625959f70d2f4fec40857270e8 
>   clients/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/common/config/ConfigDefTest.java 
> 29543dfa34d5f26397d9327d4e8d0c87b28b1fa9 
>   core/src/test/scala/integration/kafka/api/ProducerCompressionTest.scala 
> 1d73aca658a9ea31e76c3e12575703823ed0428f 
>   core/src/test/scala/integration/kafka/api/ProducerFailureHandlingTest.scala 
> 525a06076bda51eaf001fb0a47091094c06c35f7 
>   core/src/test/scala/integration/kafka/api/ProducerSendTest.scala 
> 3c37330a366e84eb3bf0a96ed45de6e3f01b0a71 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19831/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jay Kreps
> 
>

Reply via email to