-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16335/#review30592
-----------------------------------------------------------



core/src/main/scala/kafka/controller/ControllerChannelManager.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/16335/#comment58600>

    If connectToBroker timed out here, the thread will die here. So shall we 
move it into doWork, and let the first attempt trying to connect?



core/src/main/scala/kafka/controller/ControllerChannelManager.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/16335/#comment58598>

    Could we also log the whole request content? Since this happens rarely this 
should not pollute the logs.



core/src/main/scala/kafka/controller/ControllerChannelManager.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/16335/#comment58597>

    In cases when the toBroker is not responsive for a long time, the 
connectToBroker can still throw an exception and hence not being able to send 
the request. Will this be an issue?


- Guozhang Wang


On Dec. 18, 2013, 12:29 a.m., Neha Narkhede wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/16335/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 18, 2013, 12:29 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1187
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1187
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changes include 1) Handled error connecting while adding broker in controller 
> 2) Retry sending state change requests in controller's background thread
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/controller/ControllerChannelManager.scala 
> 7991e42aac4e1d9aaa4c8b185b55fd6172a43f83 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/producer/SyncProducer.scala 
> 419156eb143fb04a305c91c964307a89ba5a82fa 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16335/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neha Narkhede
> 
>

Reply via email to