-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14865/#review27787
-----------------------------------------------------------


Thanks for the patch. Could you rebase?


core/src/main/scala/kafka/cluster/Partition.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/14865/#comment54028>

    Should we create a new NotAssignedReplicaException so that we can propagate 
the error to the client more accurately?



core/src/main/scala/kafka/controller/KafkaController.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/14865/#comment54018>

    Should we name this addedReplicas? To me, new and old replicas mean the set 
of replicas after and before the reassignment.



core/src/main/scala/kafka/controller/KafkaController.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/14865/#comment54011>

    Since we already send the LeaderAndIsr request to both the old and the new 
replicas in updateLeaderEpochAndSendRequest(). It seems that sending it again 
to new replicas in startNewReplicasForReassignedPartition() is redundant. I 
guess we need that call in order to complete the replica state transition?
    



core/src/main/scala/kafka/controller/KafkaController.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/14865/#comment54014>

    Should we throw an exception here?


- Jun Rao


On Oct. 29, 2013, 5:49 p.m., Neha Narkhede wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/14865/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 29, 2013, 5:49 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1097
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1097
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Make a reusable updateLeaderEpoch API
> 
> 
> 1. Reverted changes to test log4j.properties and AdminTest 2. Fixed a bug in 
> moving leader logic during partition reassignment:
> 
> 
> 1. Changed partition reassignment behavior to first expand the replication 
> factor and then shrink it. 2. Fixed the reassign partition tool to check for 
> error conditions and improve logging 3. Did a minor improvement to the patch 
> review tool 4. Changed the version to 0.8.1 since it should be that on trunk
> 
> 
> Revert "kafka-1097, unit tests broken due to kafka-1098"
> 
> This reverts commit 0da98f7e3b5512bdc876438704c6a895e997daee.
> 
> kafka-1097, unit tests broken due to kafka-1098
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/admin/ReassignPartitionsCommand.scala 
> 2f706c94d340f1cd715210b3d8b00597d65b5dd0 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/cluster/Partition.scala 
> 5ccecd179d33abfc14dcefc35dd68de7474c6978 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/controller/KafkaController.scala 
> 88d130f55997b72a8590e4cfe92857a7320e70d5 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/controller/ReplicaStateMachine.scala 
> 212c05d65dcdc147e55f90875bacc940e30342bf 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ReplicaManager.scala 
> ee1cc0cf451b691eb91d9158ca765aeb60fc3dc8 
>   kafka-patch-review.py daf2c3597a81d0d6db574a488f3cf372701fd113 
>   project/Build.scala bcd1ca546b3f081d669892677276a0f19fb1236e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14865/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neha Narkhede
> 
>

Reply via email to