[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13804004#comment-13804004
 ] 

Kostya Golikov commented on KAFKA-1079:
---------------------------------------

1. It is common convention in Scala to distinguish pure no arg functions from 
side effecting ones. Since current implementation of choosePort creates 
socket(s) and moreover can yield different results on different runs, I guess 
it is pretty reasonable to put braces next to the method call. 
2. Okay, I will revert this change. 

> Liars in PrimitiveApiTest that promise to test api in compression mode, but 
> don't do this actually
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-1079
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1079
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 0.8
>            Reporter: Kostya Golikov
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: newbie, test
>         Attachments: testing-with-compression-producer.patch
>
>
> Long time ago (0.7) we had ByteBufferMessageSet as a part of api and it's 
> allowed us to control compression. Times goes on and now PrimitiveApiTest 
> have methods that promise to test api with compression enabled, but in fact 
> they don't. Moreover this methods almost entirely copy their counterparts 
> without compression. In particular I'm talking about 
> `testProduceAndMultiFetch` / `testProduceAndMultiFetchWithCompression` and 
> `testMultiProduce`/`testMultiProduceWithCompression` pairs. 
> The fix could be super-easy and soundness -- just parameterize methods with 
> producer of each type (with/without compression). Sadly but it isn't feasible 
> for junit3, so straightforward solution is to do the same ugly thing as 
> `testDefaultEncoderProducerAndFetchWithCompression` method does -- forget 
> about class-wide producer and roll-out it's own. I will attach path if that 
> is a problem indeed. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to