Will the 0.8 release come from the HEAD of the 0.8 branch? I'd like to experiment with it, to see if it solves some of the issues I'm seeing, with consumers refusing to consume new messages. We've been using the beta1 version.
I remember mention there was a Jira issues along these lines, which was fixed post 0.8-beta1. Which issue was that (I'd like to see if it matches what I'm seeing). Thanks, Jason On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Jay Kreps <jay.kr...@gmail.com> wrote: > I uploaded a patch against trunk which also fixes KAFKA-1036, the other > knows windows issue. Review appreciated. Should be an easy one. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1008 > > -Jay > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > KAFKA-1008 has been checked into the 0.8 branch and needs to be manually > > double-committed to trunk. To avoid merging problems, I suggest that for > > all future changes in the 0.8 branch, we double commit them to trunk. Any > > objections? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jun > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, Everyone, > > > > > > I made another pass of the remaining jiras that we plan to fix in the > 0.8 > > > final release. > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-954?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.8%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22) > > > > > > Do people agree with this list? > > > > > > Joe, > > > > > > I don't have good understanding of KAFKA-1018. Do you think this needs > to > > > be fixed in 0.8 final? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Jun > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, Everyone, > > >> > > >> We have been stabilizing the 0.8 branch since the beta1 release. I > think > > >> we are getting close to an 0.8 final release. I made an initial list > of > > the > > >> remaining jiras that should be fixed in 0.8. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.8%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22) > > >> > > >> 1. Do people agree with the list? > > >> > > >> 2. If the list is good, could people help contributing/reviewing the > > >> remaining jiras? > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> Jun > > >> > > > > > > > > >
