The contrib code is simple and probably wouldn't require too much work to
fix, but it's a lot less robust than Camus, so you would ideally need to do
some work to make it solid against all edge cases, failure scenarios and
performance bottlenecks...

I would definitely recommend investing in Camus instead, since it already
covers a lot of the challenges I'm mentioning above, and also has more
community support behind it at the moment (as far as I can tell, anyway),
so it is more likely to keep getting improvements than the contrib code.

--
Felix


On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:28 AM, <psaltis.and...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We also have a need today to ETL from Kafka into Hadoop and we do not
> currently nor have any plans to use Avro.
>
> So is the official direction based on this discussion to ditch the Kafka
> contrib code and direct people to use Camus without Avro as Ken described
> or are both solutions going to survive?
>
> I can put time into the contrib code and/or work on documenting the
> tutorial on how to make Camus work without Avro.
>
> Which is the preferred route, for the long term?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> On Wednesday, August 7, 2013 10:50:53 PM UTC-6, Ken Goodhope wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> >
> >
> > Camus can be made to work without avro. You will need to implement a
> message decoder and and a data writer.   We need to add a better tutorial
> on how to do this, but it isn't that difficult. If you decide to go down
> this path, you can always ask questions on this list. I try to make sure
> each email gets answered. But it can take me a day or two.
> >
> >
> >
> > -Ken
> >
> >
> >
> > On Aug 7, 2013, at 9:33 AM, ao...@wikimedia.org wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hi all,
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Over at the Wikimedia Foundation, we're trying to figure out the best
> way to do our ETL from Kafka into Hadoop.  We don't currently use Avro and
> I'm not sure if we are going to.  I came across this post.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > If the plan is to remove the hadoop-consumer from Kafka contrib, do
> you think we should not consider it as one of our viable options?
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Thanks!
> >
> > > -Andrew
> >
> > >
> >
> > > --
> >
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Camus - Kafka ETL for Hadoop" group.
> >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to camus_etl+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >
> > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
>
>

Reply via email to