<< How about for now: by default we will not incorporate fixes into 0.8 unless there is a compelling argument (e.g., regression/clear bug with no good workaround) to do so.
+1 On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Joel Koshy <jjkosh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Good question. Some fixes are clearly critical (e.g., consumer > deadlocks) that would impact everyone and need to go into 0.8. > Unfortunately the criticality of most other fixes is subjective and > I'm not sure how feasible it is to develop a global criteria. It > probably needs to be determined through consensus whether it needs to > go into 0.8 or not. How about for now: by default we will not > incorporate fixes into 0.8 unless there is a compelling argument > (e.g., regression/clear bug with no good workaround) to do so. > > Joel > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Jay Kreps <jay.kr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What should the criteria for fixes on 0.8 be? This seems like a > reasonable > > candidate but I don't think we discussed what we would be taking so I > > thought I would ask... > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-946 > > > > -Jay > -- /* Joe Stein http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop> */
