ouch I missed your email between all GH threads. I've also haven't seen xmlrpc usage of JSPWiki, but prefer to keep it there to see if we can keep it on 3.0.0 somehow, as we haven't any easy direct replacement. Perhaps a proper replacement would be to have a web API / some kind of JAX-RS, ideally derived from an openapi.yaml file.
Also, if we finally ditch the xmlrpc support, it'd be matter of simply removing the module, the work of locating the affected code would be already done. cheers, juan pablo On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 12:29 AM Murray Altheim <murra...@altheim.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I've not seen XML-RPC used in software, even in legacy code that I've > been hired to refactor, in many years. It would never, never be used > in any new implementation, so I'm not even sure there's value in > creating a separate support module for it. Does anyone have any > evidence that it's being used by JSPWiki users anywhere? > > Cheers, > > Murray > > On 17/04/25 07:24, weberjn (via GitHub) wrote: > > > > weberjn opened a new pull request, #381: > > URL: https://github.com/apache/jspwiki/pull/381 > > > > Pulled out the xml-rpc code into a new submodule jspwiki-xmlrpc that is > > not linked to from the parent pom. So the problems with xml-rpc can be > > deferred to a later time. I doubt that nowadays anyone use xml-rpc. > > Without xml-rpc all tests run and JSPWiki works on > > apache-tomcat-10.1.39 and wildfly-36.0.0.Final. > > > > > > -- > > ........................................................................... > Murray Altheim <murray18 at altheim dot com> = = === > http://www.altheim.com/murray/ === === > = = === > In the evening > The rice leaves in the garden > Rustle in the autumn wind > That blows through my reed hut. > -- Minamoto no Tsunenobu >
