Hi Brian,

many thanks for your comments :-) I've reworded the page following your
advice, so hopefully it makes more sense now. Haven't had a lot of sleep
lately so it isn't unexpected that the text got dense..

anyway thanks again; if you see the page isn't still clear enough, plese
feel free to edit as you see fit.


br,
juan pablo

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 11:36 PM Brian Burch <br...@pingtoo.com> wrote:

> On 30/11/18 7:54 am, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've came up with
> https://jspwiki-wiki.apache.org/Wiki.jsp?page=NewIn2.11
> > which will be refered on the upcoming release. It contains a "What does
> > that M# mean anyway?" section which I'd thank a lot if someone could
> review
> > it
>
> OK Juan Pablo, I will bite on your bait!
>
> Quoting in full....
>
> "Said that, the M# is only there to note that the release has happened
> in the middle of a transition to a "major" release, so next releases
> could still have breaking changes and still retain the release
> numbering. It does not mean the release is incomplete, only for the
> brave, in beta or something along those lines. These releases should be
> as production-ready as any other JSPWiki release."
>
>
> Sorry to pick this important paragraph apart, but you did ask for
> comments!!!
>
> 1. The English I learnt (a very long time ago) at school taught me to
> say "That said,..." rather than "Said that,.." in this particular
> context. It doesn't bother me in the slightest, but perhaps you might
> like to change it given my next comments are probably more worthy of a
> change to the paragraph?
>
> 2. "It does not.." before the sentence "These Releases.." is a bit of a
> "glass half-empty" approach, rather than an upbeat "glass half full"
> one. I would switch those sentences around so anyone who is reading the
> paragraph is reassured first, rather than warned.
>
> 3. I found the "These Releases.." sentence confusing, even though I
> thought I knew what it meant. Did you mean to say "for example,
> 2.11.0-M1 might (or might not) be followed by 2.11.0-M2, but backward
> compatibility with 2.11.0 would be maintained across this family of
> stable sub-releases (aka milestones)." I hope my version is what you
> mean to say, but if you mean the opposite then it should be highlighted
> as some sort of serious warning and be accompanied with a pointer on how
> to evaluate the risk of breakage in any particular upgrade case.
>
> I hope my comments are helpful, because they are made by someone who has
> a long history with jspwiki and a keen interest in this new milestone
> release.
>
> > Also, most probably I won't be able to run the vote until next Monday, so
> > the release most probably will delay a few days.. :-/
>
> I've been lurking on the dev list for years and recently my own plugins
> broke for no apparent reason (NOT jspwiki). Instead of fixing the
> immediate problem, I intend to move my production system onto 2.11, no
> matter how painful that might be to get my plugins working again. I am
> not expecting to have an easy "ride" from 2.10.3-git-32.
>
> Take your time with M1. I for one am very grateful for all the work you
> and the team have done so far and I look forward to moving from a clunky
> "default" skin to a nice "fishy" new one!
>
> HTH Brian
>
> > best regards,
> > juan pablo
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 3:34 PM Harry Metske <harry.met...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> sounds all good.
> >>
> >> thanks for all your efforts
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> Harry
> >>
> >>
> >> Op zo 25 nov. 2018 om 21:18 schreef Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <
> >> juanpablo.san...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to proceed with the vote of our next release, 2.11.0-M1, next
> >>> week. I've to come up with a new in 2.11 wiki page, and put in there
> what
> >>> does those Msomething means and main features for this release (Haddock
> >> by
> >>> default, new wiki pages, Java 8, new maven coordinates for jspwiki jar,
> >>> breaking changes, etc.). If all goes well, I'm expecting we could have
> >> the
> >>> release out by 2/3rd of December.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> br,
> >>> juan pablo
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to