Hi,

at least I'd name
- a ton of improvements / fixes on haddock
- jspwiki doesn't have mandatory properties anymore (JSPWIKI-1035 and
JSPWIKI-1051)
- important fixes
  - Default log is now redirected to stdout (JSPWIKI-1051) - seems quite
some people stumbled into this one
  - Rendering cache fixes (JSPWIKI-1064)
- big list of small fixes
- devs-only: test-jar available
- not directly related to the release, but we're on github now, forks and
PRs more than welcome O:-)

I wouldn't announce markdown support yet, as it's not yet usable by
end-users (we should have editors' toolbar support for that)


br,
juan pablo

as a side note, haddock-related fact that really caught my eye last week:
haddock is Bootstrap based. Usually when you have
some columns on your layout, you defer to Bootstrap's grid mechanism so it
handles them for you. Bootstrap gives you up to
12 slots and you give width to your columns by selecting how many slots
will they fill. Haddock does not use this grid layout, in
order to be able to set a very specific percentage for the Sidebar: 21.6447
percent.

And why this specific width? So the Sidebar and the page content mantain a
golden ratio based proportion; I recall reading
somewhere that the human eye finds that proportion more visually appealing
than others - source code points out to [#1] for a
more formal explanation on the reasoning behind content-driven, visually
appealing fluid layouts.

But I digress, phi is declared as a less variable on source! [#2] I really,
really like when such care is given into this kind of details :-)



[#1]: http://alistapart.com/article/content-out-layout
[#2]:
https://github.com/apache/jspwiki/blob/master/jspwiki-war/src/main/styles/haddock/default/variables.less#L86-L100


On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:42 AM, Dave Koelmeyer <
dave.koelme...@davekoelmeyer.co.nz> wrote:

> I'd like to sync this with a blog post containing new fixes and
> features. I'll have a look through JIRA and collate these, but if anyone
> has some immediate notes please let me know :)
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
>
> On 05/02/18 12:15, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
> > Hi Harry,
> >
> > that would be nice too, in fact, as most probably the RC is going to be
> > based on 2.10.3-git-48, we could already deploy it to jspwiki-wiki.a.o..
> > O:-D
> >
> >
> > br,
> > juan pablo
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 10:21 PM, Harry Metske <harry.met...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Sounds good to me.
> >> And what about deploying this release candidate to jspwiki-wiki.a.o ?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Harry
> >>
> >>> Op 4 feb. 2018 om 21:02 heeft Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <
> >> juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> as stated on past boards reports, we're going to adopt a release train
> >>> model, aiming to release from master every Feb/May/Sep/Nov, IIRC.
> >>>
> >>> so, how about reviewing current master for a few days, let's say until
> >> next
> >>> 8th, so the vote can be run through next weekend and, hopefully,
> >> releasing
> >>> 2.10.3 on ~12th? sounds reasonable?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> best regards,
> >>> juan pablo
>
> --
> Dave Koelmeyer
> http://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz
> GPG Key ID: 0x238BFF87
> The Document Foundation (TDF) member
>
>

Reply via email to