Hi Dave,

Would you be able to refresh http://digitalspider.com.au/testwiki
<http://digitalspider.com.au/testwiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Authortest>  with the
latest dev branch (2.10.2-svn-34)   ?
The site seems to be down for the last couple of days.

dirk

On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Dirk Frederickx <dirk.frederi...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Harry,
>
> 1) => 2 IP :  no issue of the template
> 2) ==> good suggestion to further optimise the template header --
>      I used the current approach to allow long page names still to be
> presented without overflow issues.
>
> dirk
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Harry Metske <harry.met...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I did some testing too, works very well, could not find any real bugs, and
>> it looks good.
>> I noticed 2 things (not sure if related to the template though) :
>>
>> 1) the page author ( in many cases) consists of 2 IP addresses , see for
>> example http://digitalspider.com.au/testwiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Authortest
>> (created with an empty profile).
>>
>> 2) Is it possible to reduce the second blue area at the top (containing
>> pagetitle and breadcrumbtrail), can you sort of combine it into the first
>> blue area containing the jspwiki logo, so that the page title and
>> breadcrumbs appear right of the jspwiki logo?
>>
>> thanks for all the work!
>>
>> kind regards,
>> Harry
>>
>>
>> On 29 July 2015 at 16:32, David Vittor <dvit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > If anyone is interested in doing some more testing on the haddock
>> template,
>> > I've updated my wiki to use JSPWiki v2.10.2-svn-28
>> > http://www.digitalspider.com.au/testwiki/
>> >
>> > Note: Dirk I've fixed my deployment process, where I was using an old
>> > version of haddock.js. This should now be functioning correctly.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > David V
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, David Vittor <dvit...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Link is here:
>> > > http://www.digitalspider.com.au/testwiki/
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:07 PM, David Vittor <dvit...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi Dirk,
>> > >>
>> > >> I've managed to update the wiki now so you can test it here. Sorry
>> for
>> > >> the delay.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Dirk Frederickx <
>> > >> dirk.frederi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Hi David,
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Would it be possible to refresh  digital spider.com.au/testwiki
>> with
>> > >>> the latest  Haddock template ?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> It would be really helpful to help testing the template on more
>> > browsers
>> > >>> platforms.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> dirk
>> > >>>
>> > >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > >>> From: Dirk Frederickx <dirk.frederi...@gmail.com>
>> > >>> Date: Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:42 PM
>> > >>> Subject: Re: Haddock template and bugs
>> > >>> To: u...@jspwiki.apache.org
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Dave, all,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I just posted a large update of the HADDOCK template.
>> (2.10.2-svn-17)
>> > >>> It stabilises the plain editor, and has many UI improvements.  (more
>> > >>> detail in change notes)
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The HADDOCK template is now close to completion, but needs further
>> > >>> hardening.
>> > >>> (group related JSPs still need to be done ;  and login/preferences
>> > needs
>> > >>> some more tweaking)
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I expect to post more documentation during the coming weeks.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> br,
>> > >>>    dirk
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Dave Koelmeyer <
>> > >>> dave.koelme...@davekoelmeyer.co.nz> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On 27/05/15 09:13, Dirk Frederickx wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>> Dave,
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Yes, whenever HADDOCK gets more stabilised it's a candidate to
>> become
>> > >>>>> the
>> > >>>>> new default.
>> > >>>>> Feedback is much appreciated !  -- plse file your bugs in Jira
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Thanks, and will do :)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> --
>> > >>>> Dave Koelmeyer
>> > >>>> http://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to