Hi Dave, Would you be able to refresh http://digitalspider.com.au/testwiki <http://digitalspider.com.au/testwiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Authortest> with the latest dev branch (2.10.2-svn-34) ? The site seems to be down for the last couple of days.
dirk On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Dirk Frederickx <dirk.frederi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Harry, > > 1) => 2 IP : no issue of the template > 2) ==> good suggestion to further optimise the template header -- > I used the current approach to allow long page names still to be > presented without overflow issues. > > dirk > > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Harry Metske <harry.met...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I did some testing too, works very well, could not find any real bugs, and >> it looks good. >> I noticed 2 things (not sure if related to the template though) : >> >> 1) the page author ( in many cases) consists of 2 IP addresses , see for >> example http://digitalspider.com.au/testwiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Authortest >> (created with an empty profile). >> >> 2) Is it possible to reduce the second blue area at the top (containing >> pagetitle and breadcrumbtrail), can you sort of combine it into the first >> blue area containing the jspwiki logo, so that the page title and >> breadcrumbs appear right of the jspwiki logo? >> >> thanks for all the work! >> >> kind regards, >> Harry >> >> >> On 29 July 2015 at 16:32, David Vittor <dvit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi All, >> > >> > If anyone is interested in doing some more testing on the haddock >> template, >> > I've updated my wiki to use JSPWiki v2.10.2-svn-28 >> > http://www.digitalspider.com.au/testwiki/ >> > >> > Note: Dirk I've fixed my deployment process, where I was using an old >> > version of haddock.js. This should now be functioning correctly. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > David V >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, David Vittor <dvit...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > > Link is here: >> > > http://www.digitalspider.com.au/testwiki/ >> > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:07 PM, David Vittor <dvit...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> > >> Hi Dirk, >> > >> >> > >> I've managed to update the wiki now so you can test it here. Sorry >> for >> > >> the delay. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Dirk Frederickx < >> > >> dirk.frederi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> >> > >>> Hi David, >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> Would it be possible to refresh digital spider.com.au/testwiki >> with >> > >>> the latest Haddock template ? >> > >>> >> > >>> It would be really helpful to help testing the template on more >> > browsers >> > >>> platforms. >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> dirk >> > >>> >> > >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> > >>> From: Dirk Frederickx <dirk.frederi...@gmail.com> >> > >>> Date: Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:42 PM >> > >>> Subject: Re: Haddock template and bugs >> > >>> To: u...@jspwiki.apache.org >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> Dave, all, >> > >>> >> > >>> I just posted a large update of the HADDOCK template. >> (2.10.2-svn-17) >> > >>> It stabilises the plain editor, and has many UI improvements. (more >> > >>> detail in change notes) >> > >>> >> > >>> The HADDOCK template is now close to completion, but needs further >> > >>> hardening. >> > >>> (group related JSPs still need to be done ; and login/preferences >> > needs >> > >>> some more tweaking) >> > >>> >> > >>> I expect to post more documentation during the coming weeks. >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> br, >> > >>> dirk >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Dave Koelmeyer < >> > >>> dave.koelme...@davekoelmeyer.co.nz> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> On 27/05/15 09:13, Dirk Frederickx wrote: >> > >>>> >> > >>>>> Dave, >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Yes, whenever HADDOCK gets more stabilised it's a candidate to >> become >> > >>>>> the >> > >>>>> new default. >> > >>>>> Feedback is much appreciated ! -- plse file your bugs in Jira >> > >>>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Thanks, and will do :) >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> -- >> > >>>> Dave Koelmeyer >> > >>>> http://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > >