Hi all, as Dave noted below, it would be nice to have a release. Furthermore, since 2.10.1 we have in trunk - support to run JSPWiki on dockerized containers - complete rewrite of ajax functionality - portable binaries
not only all of these are interesting enough they could merit a release on their own, there are also a couple of fixes which have recently hit the user list, so it seems like a very good time to proceed with 2.10.2 release. thoughts? br, juan pablo On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:06 PM, David (spindift) <demer...@spindrift.com> wrote: > If you're planning on making a large-ish refactor, it would be nice to > have an official release prior to introducing the changes. That would > consolidate the updates-to-date into a new official baseline. > > Just a thought... > DaveE > > > On 6/23/2015 7:47 AM, David Vittor wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I've decided to remove this from trunk, as I will be unavailable to >> support this for a few weeks. >> >> I've reverted the trunk and checked in the changes to a Branch: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jspwiki/branches/JSPWIKI_2_10_PICO_BRANCH >> >> I've also attached here a pico.patch in case someone wants to test this >> against their version of trunk source. Apply the patch on the current >> version 2.10.2-svn-17. >> >> Let me know your thoughts if you do get to test this, and I'll see if I >> can merge this into the trunk, when I have more time. >> >> Kind regards, >> David V >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:09 PM, David Vittor <dvit...@gmail.com <mailto: >> dvit...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Devs, >> >> Following close on the heels of the Haddock template rewrite, I've >> released 2.10.2-svn-18 - a small rewrite of the core WikiEngine. >> >> I've been doing a some research into Dependency Injection, I've >> decided that for JSPWiki, I think the best framework would be >> PicoContainer. >> http://picocontainer.com/ >> >> This change will take a long time to complete, but I've started by >> adding it to the pom.xml, changing the ClassUtil class to create >> and list all the "components" (InternalModule), and changing these >> modules (SearchManager, AdminBeanManager, WorkflowManager, >> DefaultFitlerManager, etc) to have empty constructors, and a >> method called initialize( WikiEngine, Properties ). >> >> Just the above change took ages to get right, but now all test >> cases pass, and I've played with it in my dev environment and >> seems like everything works. >> >> I hope now that the core is in place, we can slowly start making >> changes to actually use the PicoContainer functionality for >> dynamic component injection. >> >> I have made a trade off however. Currently the file >> "ini/classmappings.xml" is no longer valid, and the core classes >> are hard coded inside "ClassUtil". >> >> Let me know if anyone has any thoughts on this. >> >> Kind regards, >> David V >> >> >> >