Hi Folks, What do you think about the idea of supporting a lightweight cache over records in the thin client?
In the thick client we have near caches (yes, of course, they add complexity to the product). There is no such option in the thin one. Yes, you can cache this with third-party tools like guava. At the same time, my idea is that the product could somehow notify such mini-cache about changes (probably in batches). For some scenarios, asking server nodes for the rarely changed cache value is overhead. And I remember Ignite 1.x caches were on-heap (without off-heap - on-heap data copying cost) Sincerely, Dmitriy Pavlov
