Thanks for the question, Aleksandr. Can you clarify what do you mean by existing User Object Serialization protocol? Am I right assuming that you are talking about Mappers that are supported in Record and KV APIs?
-- Best regards, Aleksandr Pakhomov > On 11 Jul 2024, at 18:39, Aleksandr Polovtsev <alexpolovt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, Aleksandr, thank you for the great effort! > > Could you please explain how this protocol differs from the existing User > Object Serialization protocol? Why do we need another one? > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 6:20 PM Aleksandr Pakhomov <apk...@gmail.com > <mailto:apk...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> Hi, dear community. >> >> I would like to propose the design for supporting user objects in >> Ignite 3. All APIs that can accept/return custom objects that are >> not a part of Ignite 3 distribution are going to have additional >> parameter -- argument/result marshaller. >> >> I would appreciate any feedback, feel free to reply to this >> message or leave the comment in the Confluence. >> >> IEP-124: User Object Serialization - Apache Ignite - Apache Software >> Foundation >> cwiki.apache.org >> >> >> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-124%3A+User+Object+Serialization>IEP-124: >> User Object Serialization - Apache Ignite - Apache Software Foundation >> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-124%3A+User+Object+Serialization> >> cwiki.apache.org >> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-124%3A+User+Object+Serialization> >> >> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-124%3A+User+Object+Serialization> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Aleksandr Pakhomov >> > > > -- > With regards, > Aleksandr Polovtsev
