By placing the @Deprecated annotation on the property.

пн, 17 окт. 2022 г. в 19:07, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org>:

> How can we deprecate this?
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 5:30 PM Alexei Scherbakov <
> alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > We can do breaking changes by following the approved procedure: 1)
> > deprecate in the next release 2) remove in the some release after the
> next
> >
> > The ticket looks fine to me.
> >
> > пн, 17 окт. 2022 г. в 15:50, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > We MUST break this, of course!
> > > Atomic operations inside the transaction is a wrong and unexpected
> > > behaviour and MUST be restricted for every user.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 3:05 PM Julia Bakulina <julia.bak...@yandex.ru
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Team,
> > > >
> > > > I have found this ticket
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8801 -
> > > > Change default behaviour of atomic operations inside transactions -
> in
> > > > backlog and created a PR with changes. The ticket relates to
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2313.
> > > > During the review process it appeared that probably there is no need
> in
> > > > this ticket as it includes the changes of the default API and we
> should
> > > not
> > > > break backward compatibility.
> > > >
> > > > Do we need these changes? Should the ticket be closed with "won't
> fix"?
> > > >
> > > > Have a nice day,
> > > > Julia
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Alexei Scherbakov
> >
>


-- 

Best regards,
Alexei Scherbakov

Reply via email to