+1 to option 4 On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 5:15 PM Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 to option 2 > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 3:52 PM Roman Puchkovskiy < > roman.puchkovs...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 to option 2 > > > > чт, 13 янв. 2022 г. в 15:58, Sergey <macrerg...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > +1 for option2 (only @Nullable) > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Sergey Kosarev. > > > > > > > > > чт, 13 янв. 2022 г. в 13:25, Alexander Polovtcev < > > alexpolovt...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > Dear Igniters, > > > > > > > > In this thread > > > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/2l50swqd1dymf2qjgrb4wqrbmwjtj02f> > > we've > > > > discussed possible approaches to using null-related annotations. As > the > > > > result, the following approaches were proposed: > > > > > > > > 1. Use both @Nullable and @NotNull annotations everywhere; > > > > 2. Use only @Nullable; > > > > 3. Use only @NotNull; > > > > 4. Do not use* @*Nullable nor @NotNull. > > > > > > > > I would like to propose a vote: please post the corresponding number > > of the > > > > option you like. The voting will commence on Thursday, January 20 at > > 11:00 > > > > UTC. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > With regards, > > > > Aleksandr Polovtcev > > > > > > >
