Also, it's well known use case of msgpack in the world of memory grids --
tarantool.io uses msgpack for clients binary protocol [1]
So writing connectors to tarantool is quite easy task.

[1] --
https://www.tarantool.io/en/doc/latest/dev_guide/internals/box_protocol/

чт, 17 июн. 2021 г. в 16:15, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>:

> Ivan,
>
> > Have you considered format with schema?
>
> 1. We should be able to serialize arbitrary user data on the client side.
>     I think we don't want to require extra steps from the user.
>
> 2. MsgPack can be also used in a schemaful way, when user objects are
> written as arrays, not as maps - so that field names are not included.
>
>
> > we should benchmark formats thoroughly
>
> Strictly speaking, the IEP is about the format (the spec), not about the
> implementation.
> The format itself is simple and efficient, there is nothing to make it
> slower than anything else.
> C# impl proves this by beating every competitor [1].
>
>
> > Could you please share your code for benchmarks?
>
> The code is linked in the IEP [2]
>
>
> [1]
>
> https://aloiskraus.wordpress.com/2019/09/29/net-serialization-benchmark-2019-roundup/
> [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/9178
>
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 4:02 PM Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Could you please share your code for benchmarks?
> >
> > чт, 17 июн. 2021 г. в 15:56, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Hi, Pavel. Have you considered format with schema? Or schemaless of a
> > > candidate format was  a prerequisite?
> > > As for me, msgpack is great, but I suppose that we should benchmark
> > > formats thoroughly. And not only for Java.
> > >
> > > чт, 17 июн. 2021 г. в 15:29, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > >> Igniters,
> > >>
> > >> I have drafted an IEP on thin client serialization format [1],
> > >> please review and let me know what you think.
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-75+Thin+Client+Serialization
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
> >
>


-- 
Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy

Reply via email to