Hello, Maxim!

You are free to revert any commit which has led to any new stable test
failure, or new flaky test that was non-flaky before.

Just revert the change and reopen the ticket.

The problem here is that it's very hard to detect on the spot, most of
MTCGA e-mails are false positives and even if they are not, it is not
relevant for most of developers.

WDYT? I'm also still waiting for more input.

Regards,
-- 
Ilya Kasnacheev


ср, 14 апр. 2021 г. в 21:26, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>:

> +1 for new JIRA issues
> -1 for MTCGA notifications
>
> Why we should hide errors from the dev-list? Who should take care of
> issues reported by MTCGA.Bot in this case?
> We must apply stricter rules for such issues: a commit leading to an
> error must be reverted.
>
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 20:00, Denis Mekhanikov <dmekhani...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Huge +1 to this.
> >
> > I've already brought up this topic in the past:
> >
> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Bots-on-dev-list-td34406.html
> > I hope some day newcomers won't need to set up their email filters when
> > they come to the developers list.
> >
> > Denis
> >
> > ср, 14 апр. 2021 г. в 18:07, Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > +1 to move issues to the issues list.
> > >
> > > For MTCGA, maybe build@?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:35 PM Ilya Kasnacheev <il...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello!
> > > >
> > > > We have a discussion on how to ensure best engagement in dev@ list,
> and
> > > it
> > > > seems that Issue Created emails from IGNITE project consume a lot of
> > > screen
> > > > space, it's hard to spot genuine discussions in
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@ignite.apache.org for
> example.
> > > >
> > > > We already have issues@ mailing list. I propose that we stop
> sending any
> > > > JIRA emails to dev@. If anyone wishes to get just Created emails,
> they
> > > can
> > > > subscribe to these messages in their JIRA account settings. I imagine
> > > most
> > > > of you already filter these messages out, so you may need to adjust
> your
> > > > filters slightly.
> > > >
> > > > A distant second is MTCGA messages, which are also autogenerated and
> not
> > > > informative for most readers of the channel, since they are at best
> > > > targeted at a single committer and at worst flaky.
> > > >
> > > > Where could we move those? What is your opinion here, on both issues?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Atri
> > > Apache Concerted
> > >
>

Reply via email to