Folks, The branch `ignite-2.10` for the release has been created.
The list of issues related to 2.10 release [1]. If I excluded your issue you are working on from the release feel free to set the `fixVersion` back. [1] https://s.apache.org/qa6kk On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 at 11:43, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> wrote: > > Folks, > > 1. > I've prepared the list of unhandled important documentation issues for > the 2.10 release, please check the wiki page link [1]. Note, that some > of the important (from my point of view) documentation issues even not > created. > > 2. > Here is the list of resolved issues which seems to be documented, but > an appropriate documentation task doesn't exist. Should we create > appropriate documentation issues for them? Check the list [3]. > > 3. > Some of the documentation pages must be completed prior to 2.10 > release or removed, right? Check the [2] page for example. > > > Denis, Nikita > > > So we should probably allocate more time for this work. > Let's start the work, track the progress and looks at how it goes. > I'll try to ask some folks for the help with documentation and also > plan to help with the issues by myself. We can shift the dates if it's > necessary, but currently, I see no reasons. > > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.10#ApacheIgnite2.10-Documentationtasksforimportantfeatures > [2] https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/cpp-specific/ > [3] The list of issues without documentation tasks : > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13488 > Add command to control.(sh|bin) to get an arbitrary Metric > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13467 > Add events for snapshot operation state > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13535 > Support cluster snapshot security permissions > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13426 > Add command to control.(sh|bin) to get an arbitrary SystemView > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13327 > Add a metric for processed keys when rebuilding indexes. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13310 > Add tracing of SQL queries. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12380 > Add event for node validation failure. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7623 > Thin client Java API - async API > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13380 > Output IgniteSystemProperties via ignite.sh > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11731 > CPP: Implement Cluster API > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13308 > C++: Thin client transactions > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12754 > .NET: Thin Client: Service invocation > > On Fri, 25 Dec 2020 at 22:43, Никита Сафонов <vlasovpavel2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi Denis, Maxim, > > > > I'd like to clarify that I'm pretty sure to complete the tasks below before > > the voting date: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13659 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13796 > > > > I'll start to work on them right after the long Russian NY holidays. > > But I'm not quite sure that we'll meet the deadline with other tickets > > that should be on the list. > > So we should probably allocate more time for this work. > > > > I'd be glad to get your opinion on this. > > > > Regards, > > Nikita > > > > сб, 19 дек. 2020 г. в 11:39, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>: > > > > > Denis, Nikita > > > > > > Yes, the list of important documentation issues will be ready prior to > > > the scope freeze date. I'll prepare it. > > > > > > I mean if we want to start working right now on some documentation > > > task we can choose any important from those list of opened tasks. > > > > > > On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 19:55, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Maxim, > > > > > > > > Presently, there are 70 documentation tickets. Probably, these are all > > > the > > > > tickets that we are moving from a release to a release. Could you help > > > > to > > > > prepare a list of 2.10-specific tickets (features, enhancements, > > > > required > > > > updates due to a change in the behavior)? As before, we can track these > > > > important 2.10-specific tickets under the "Documentation tasks for > > > > important tasks" features: > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.10#ApacheIgnite2.10-Documentationtasksforimportantfeatures > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 8:14 AM Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello Nikita, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your support. > > > > > > > > > > You can find the 2.10 related documentation issues on the release wiki > > > > > page [1]. Currently, some of the important issues don't have the right > > > > > priorities, so it's better to sort them first. > > > > > > > > > > As for the time estimates, we've previously agreed that documentation > > > > > should be ready prior to the release voting date. You can find the > > > > > actual release dates here [2]. > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.10#ApacheIgnite2.10-Allunresolveddocumentationtasks > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.10#ApacheIgnite2.10-Releasephases > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 18:48, Никита Сафонов < > > > vlasovpavel2...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be more than happy to support the 2.10 release and contribute to > > > the > > > > > > documentation. > > > > > > So could you please give me a scope of documentation tasks for 2.10 > > > with > > > > > > the approximate time estimates? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Nikita > > > > > > > > > > > > пн, 7 дек. 2020 г. в 16:23, Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw....@gmail.com > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Support it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > пн, 7 дек. 2020 г. в 14:03, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I propose to shift a bit the release date since 2.9.1 has not > > > > > released > > > > > > > yet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Scope Freeze: December 28, 2020 > > > > > > > > Code Freeze: December 28, 2020 > > > > > > > > Voting Date: January 25, 2021 > > > > > > > > Release Date: February 1, 2021 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 12:59, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've marked all the valuable features of 2.10 release with an > > > > > > > > > appropriate label. Please, let me know if I've missed > > > > > > > > > anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is the link to the JIRA: > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/1hyfu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 12:28, Anton Vinogradov > > > > > > > > > <a...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Distributed environment tests [2] (Nikolay Izhikov, > > > > > > > > > > > Anton > > > > > > > > > > > Vinogradov, Ivan Daschinskiy) > > > > > > > > > > > Will all related issues be included in the 2.10? > > > > > > > > > > We're at the final preparations phase. Going to start the > > > merge > > > > > > > > discussion > > > > > > > > > > soon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 4:48 PM Alexey Zinoviev < > > > > > > > > zaleslaw....@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, Model Export/Import for ML will be finished, now it's > > > > > ready, > > > > > > > > but under > > > > > > > > > > > testing on my side. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 11 нояб. 2020 г. в 16:08, Nikolay Izhikov < > > > > > nizhi...@apache.org > > > > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I suggest to include CDC feature to the 2.10 scope. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 11 нояб. 2020 г., в 16:06, Maxim Muzafarov < > > > > > mmu...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > написал(а): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you clarify the issue statuses according to the > > > Apache > > > > > > > Ignite > > > > > > > > > > > > > Roadmap [1] and the 2.10 Apache Ignite Release? Here > > > are > > > > > some > > > > > > > > major > > > > > > > > > > > > > issues which are expected to be included in 2.10 with > > > the > > > > > > > unknown > > > > > > > > > > > > > status: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Distributed environment tests [2] (Nikolay Izhikov, > > > Anton > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vinogradov, Ivan Daschinskiy) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will all related issues be included in the 2.10? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Native persistence defragmentation [6][7] (Anton > > > > > Kalashnikov, > > > > > > > > Sergey > > > > > > > > > > > > Chugunov) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are we on the last mile with this for 2.10? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Consistency-related improvements for atomic caches > > > [3] > > > > > > > (Alexey > > > > > > > > > > > > Scherbakov) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do we have the JIRA issue? Will the issue be included > > > in > > > > > 2.10? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Tombstone objects during rebalancing [4] (Alexey > > > > > Scherbakov) > > > > > > > > > > > > > The issue [4] is in progress state. Will it be > > > > > > > > > > > > > finished > > > > > prior > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > code > > > > > > > > > > > > freeze? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - SQL runtime statistics (Konstantin Orlov) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do we have an IEP for this or JIRA issue? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - ML Model export/import [5] (Alexey Zinoviev) > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Will the issue be finished? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+Roadmap > > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-56%3A+Distributed+environment+tests > > > > > > > > > > > > > [3] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-12+Make+ATOMIC+Caches+Consistent+Again > > > > > > > > > > > > > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11704 > > > > > > > > > > > > > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6642 > > > > > > > > > > > > > [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13143 > > > > > > > > > > > > > [7] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-47%3A+Native+persistence+defragmentation > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 15:58, Maxim Muzafarov < > > > > > > > mmu...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Folks, > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I've created the release page on the Confluence. Feel > > > > > free to > > > > > > > > mail in > > > > > > > > > > > > >> case of any errors. > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.10 > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 17:56, Maxim Muzafarov < > > > > > > > mmu...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Let's finalize the discussion [1] about the next > > > upcoming > > > > > > > major > > > > > > > > > > > Apache > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Ignite 2.10 release. The major improvements related > > > to > > > > > the > > > > > > > > proposed > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> release: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> - Improvements for partition clearing related parts > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> - Add tracing of SQL queries. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> - CPP: Implement Cluster API > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> - .NET: Thin client: Transactions > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> - .NET: Thin Client: Continuous Query > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> - Java Thin client Kubernetes discovery > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Total: 166 RESOLVED issues [2]. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Let's start the discussion about Time and Scope, and > > > > > also I > > > > > > > > propose > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> myself as the release manager of the Apache Ignite > > > 2.10. > > > > > If > > > > > > > > you'd > > > > > > > > > > > like > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> to lead this release, please, let us know, I see no > > > > > problems > > > > > > > > to chose > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> a better candidate. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Proposed release timeline: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Scope Freeze: December 10, 2020 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Code Freeze: December 24, 2020 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Voting Date: January 18, 2021 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Release Date: January 25, 2021 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Proposed release scope: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> WDYT? > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/2-9-1-release-proposal-tp49769p49867.html > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.10%20and%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20and%20resolution%20%3D%20Fixed%20order%20by%20priority%20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
