Hi guys,

Maybe I'm missing something but I don't undestand how StatefulSet relates to
the described functionality.
StatefulSet is more about persistence. Correct me if I'm wrong but my
current understanding is that we don't need to have any explicit state for a
thin client connection. I'd like this thing to be simple: if I'm working
with a pod and it fails then I just go to another one and try my request
again. The corner case is the best-effort affinity. As far as I can it's not
a strict rule to communicate only directly with a pod running a node with a
primary partition. It's ok to fail-over in this case and communicate with
any pod. Am I right? 



--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/

Reply via email to