Hello, I've compared performances of 2.9 and 2.8.1 using Yardstick and some atomic/transactional/SQL operations. Ignite 2.9 is up to 7% slower in my configuration. Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13337 for details. Is this performance drop a blocker for 2.9 release?
-- Regards, Ivan Artiukhov чт, 6 авг. 2020 г. в 11:10, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>: > I recently found, that control.sh is broken since 2.8.0 a little bit. > Script returns always 0 code, despite the fact, that CommandHandler returns > code correctly. > > Here is the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13328, > patch > is available. > > пт, 31 июл. 2020 г. в 14:09, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com>: > > > Ivan, > > > > IGNITE-13306 cherry-picked to 2.9 > > > > пт, 31 июл. 2020 г. в 13:43, Ivan Rakov <ivan.glu...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13306 is merged to > master. > > > Can you please cherry-pick to 2.9? > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 7:42 PM Ilya Kasnacheev < > > ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hello! > > >> > > >> I don't think that IGNITE-13006 > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13006> is a blocker in > > any > > >> way. It is a good candidate for 3.0. > > >> > > >> ignite-spring will work with 4.x Spring as well as 5.x and the user is > > >> free > > >> to bump Spring version. I think bumping this dependency explicitly is > > >> infeasible since it may break existing code. > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> -- > > >> Ilya Kasnacheev > > >> > > >> > > >> ср, 22 июл. 2020 г. в 10:22, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com>: > > >> > > >> > Guys, > > >> > > > >> > We are in code-freeze phase now. I've moved almost all non-blocker > > >> > unresolved tickets from 2.9 to the next release. If you think that > > >> > some ticket is a blocker and should be included into 2.9 release, > > please > > >> > write a note in this thread. > > >> > > > >> > There are some tickets with "blocker" priority targeted to 2.9, some > > of > > >> > them in "open" state and still unassigned, and I'm not sure we need > > all > > >> of > > >> > these tickets in 2.9: > > >> > > > >> > IGNITE-13006 [1] (Apache Ignite spring libs upgrade from version 4x > to > > >> > spring 5.2 version or later) - Is it really a blocker for 2.9 > release? > > >> If > > >> > yes, can somebody help with resolving this ticket? > > >> > > > >> > IGNITE-11942 [2] (IGFS and Hadoop Accelerator Discontinuation) - > > ticket > > >> in > > >> > "Patch available" state. There is a thread on dev-list related to > this > > >> > ticket ([6]), but as far as I understand we still don't have > consensus > > >> > about version for this patch (2.9, 2.10, 3.0). > > >> > > > >> > IGNITE-12489 [3] (Error during purges by expiration: Unknown page > > type) > > >> - > > >> > perhaps issue is already resolved by some related tickets, there is > > >> still > > >> > no reproducer, no additional details and no work in progress. I > > propose > > >> to > > >> > move this ticket to the next release. > > >> > > > >> > IGNITE-12911 [4] (B+Tree Corrupted exception when using a key > > extracted > > >> > from a BinaryObject value object --- and SQL enabled) - ticket in > > "Patch > > >> > available" state, but there is no activity since May 2020. Anton > > >> > Kalashnikov, Ilya Kasnacheev, do we have any updates on this ticket? > > Is > > >> it > > >> > still in progress? > > >> > > > >> > IGNITE-12553 [5] ([IEP-35] public Java metric API) - since the new > > >> metrics > > >> > framework is already released in 2.8 and it's still marked with > > >> > @IgniteExperemental annotation, I think this ticket is not a > blocker. > > I > > >> > propose to change the ticket priority and move it to the next > release. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13006 > > >> > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11942 > > >> > [3]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12489 > > >> > [4]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12911 > > >> > [5]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12553 > > >> > [6]: > > >> > > > >> > > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Complete-Discontinuation-of-IGFS-and-Hadoop-Accelerator-td42282.html > > >> > > > >> > пт, 17 июл. 2020 г. в 11:50, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com > >: > > >> > > > >> >> Ivan, > > >> >> > > >> >> Merged to 2.9. > > >> >> > > >> >> Thanks > > >> >> > > >> >> пт, 17 июл. 2020 г. в 01:35, Ivan Rakov <ivan.glu...@gmail.com>: > > >> >> > > >> >>> Alex, > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Tracing is merged to master: > > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13060 > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Can you please port it to 2.9? > > >> >>> For you convenience, there's PR versus 2.9 with conflicts > resolved: > > >> >>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8046/files > > >> >>> > > >> >>> -- > > >> >>> Best Regards, > > >> >>> Ivan Rakov > > >> >>> > > >> >>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:33 PM Alex Plehanov < > > >> plehanov.a...@gmail.com> > > >> >>> wrote: > > >> >>> > > >> >>>> Ivan, > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Looks like master is broken after IGNITE-13246 (but everything is > > ok > > >> in > > >> >>>> 2.9 > > >> >>>> branch) > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> ср, 15 июл. 2020 г. в 18:54, Alex Plehanov < > > plehanov.a...@gmail.com > > >> >: > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > Zhenya, Ivan, > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> > I've cherry-picked IGNITE-13229 and IGNITE-13246 to ignite-2.9 > > >> branch. > > >> >>>> > Thank you. > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> > ср, 15 июл. 2020 г. в 18:31, Ivan Bessonov < > > bessonov...@gmail.com > > >> >: > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> >> Guys, > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> can you please backport > > >> >>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13246 > > >> >>>> >> to ignite-2.9? Me and Alexey Kuznetsov really want these new > > >> events > > >> >>>> in > > >> >>>> >> release. > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> This time I prepared PR with resolved conflicts: > > >> >>>> >> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8042 > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> Thank you! > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> вт, 14 июл. 2020 г. в 19:39, Zhenya Stanilovsky > > >> >>>> >> <arzamas...@mail.ru.invalid > > >> >>>> >> >: > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> >> > Alex, i also suggest to merge this > > >> >>>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13229 too, > > >> GridClient > > >> >>>> >> > leakage and further TC OOM preventing. > > >> >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> >> > >Ivan, > > >> >>>> >> > > > > >> >>>> >> > >It was already in release scope as discussed in this > thread. > > >> >>>> >> > > > > >> >>>> >> > >вт, 14 июл. 2020 г. в 14:31, Ivan Rakov < > > >> ivan.glu...@gmail.com > > >> >>>> >: > > >> >>>> >> > > > > >> >>>> >> > >> Hi, > > >> >>>> >> > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> We are still waiting for a final review of Tracing > > >> >>>> functionality [1] > > >> >>>> >> > until > > >> >>>> >> > >> the end of tomorrow (July 15). > > >> >>>> >> > >> We anticipate that it will be merged to Ignite master no > > >> later > > >> >>>> than > > >> >>>> >> July > > >> >>>> >> > >> 16. > > >> >>>> >> > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> Sorry for being a bit late here. Alex P., can you include > > [1] > > >> >>>> to the > > >> >>>> >> > >> release scope? > > >> >>>> >> > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13060 > > >> >>>> >> > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> -- > > >> >>>> >> > >> Best Regards, > > >> >>>> >> > >> Ivan Rakov > > >> >>>> >> > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 6:16 AM Alexey Kuznetsov < > > >> >>>> >> > akuznet...@gridgain.com > > > >> >>>> >> > >> wrote: > > >> >>>> >> > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >>> Alex, > > >> >>>> >> > >>> > > >> >>>> >> > >>> Can you cherry-pick to Ignite 2.9 this issue: > > >> >>>> >> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13246 ? > > >> >>>> >> > >>> > > >> >>>> >> > >>> This issue is about BASELINE events and it is very > useful > > >> for > > >> >>>> >> > notification > > >> >>>> >> > >>> external tools about changes in baseline. > > >> >>>> >> > >>> > > >> >>>> >> > >>> Thank you! > > >> >>>> >> > >>> > > >> >>>> >> > >>> --- > > >> >>>> >> > >>> Alexey Kuznetsov > > >> >>>> >> > >>> > > >> >>>> >> > >> > > >> >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> -- > > >> >>>> >> Sincerely yours, > > >> >>>> >> Ivan Bessonov > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy >
