Hi Alex, It's been a year since we voted to discontinue this integration [1] and it wasn't removed from the source code earlier only because of the internal dependencies with the ML component. Now all the dependencies are gone and Ignite 2.9 is the right version to finish the discontinuation process. It would make sense to wait for Ignite 3.0 only there are some breaking changes in the APIs that will stay in Ignite.
@Anton Kalashnikov <akalashni...@gridgain.com>, you mentioned that you removed some methods from the configuration. Could you please list them here? Are they Hadoop-specific or generic? [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Complete-Discontinuation-of-IGFS-and-Hadoop-Accelerator-td42405.html - Denis On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:52 AM Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > Guys, > > Any updates here? Looks like we still don't have a consensus about release > version for this patch (already mention it in the release thread). > Currently, the ticket is still targeted to 2.9. > > ср, 15 июл. 2020 г. в 00:40, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > > > I don't think it's required to wait until Ignite 3.0 to make this happen. > > If I'm not mistaken, we stopped releasing Hadoop binaries and sources a > > long time ago (at least you can't longer find them on the downloads > page). > > Also, we removed all the mentioning from the documentation and website. > > Nobody complained or requested for a maintenance release since that time. > > Thus, I would remove the integration in 2.9. If anybody shows up later > then > > they can use the sources in the 2.8 branch and do whatever they want. > > > > - > > Denis > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 3:52 AM Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > We are breaking backwards compatibility, > > > so this can be only done for Ignite 3.0, am I right? > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 1:46 PM Anton Kalashnikov <kaa....@yandex.ru> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > The task of removal IGFS and Hadoop accelerator is ready to review.( > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11942) > > > > I've already asked some guys to take a look at it but if somebody > > > familiar > > > > with this part of code, feel free to take a look at the changes > > > > too(especially scripts changes). > > > > > > > > I also think it is good to decide which release it should be planned > > on. > > > > This task planned for 2.9 right now but I should notice that first of > > all > > > > there are a lot of changes and secondly there are some changes in > > public > > > > API(removed some methods from configuration). So maybe it makes sense > > to > > > > move this ticket to the next release. What do you think? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best regards, > > > > Anton Kalashnikov > > > > > > > > > > > > 10.02.2020, 15:45, "Alexey Zinoviev" <zaleslaw....@gmail.com>: > > > > > Thank you so you much! Will wait:) > > > > > > > > > > пн, 10 февр. 2020 г. в 15:13, Alexey Goncharuk < > > > > alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > >> Got it, then no need to rush, let's wait for the TF-IGFS > > decoupling. > > > > >> > > > > >> пн, 10 февр. 2020 г. в 13:15, Alexey Zinoviev < > > > zaleslaw....@gmail.com > > > > >: > > > > >> > > > > >> > Tensorflow integration uses IGFS, if you have any idea how to > > store > > > > files > > > > >> > in memory by another way, please suggest something. > > > > >> > I hope to decouple Ignite-TF integration to the separate > > repository > > > > >> before > > > > >> > release 2.9 with its own file system over Ignite Caches > > > > >> > > > > > >> > пн, 10 февр. 2020 г. в 12:49, Ivan Pavlukhin < > > vololo...@gmail.com > > > >: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Is not it blocked by > > > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10292 as stated > > in > > > > JIRA? > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > @Alex Zinoviev could you please shed some light on this? > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Best regards, > > > > >> > > Ivan Pavlukhin > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > пн, 10 февр. 2020 г. в 12:46, Anton Kalashnikov < > > > kaa....@yandex.ru > > > > >: > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > I found the correct ticket for such activity - > > > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11942 > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > -- > > > > >> > > > Best regards, > > > > >> > > > Anton Kalashnikov > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > 10.02.2020, 12:16, "Anton Kalashnikov" <kaa....@yandex.ru > >: > > > > >> > > > > Hello. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > I created a ticket for this activity - > > > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12647. And if > we > > > are > > > > >> still > > > > >> > > in consensus I'll do it at the nearest time(I've already had > > the > > > > >> prepared > > > > >> > > code). > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > -- > > > > >> > > > > Best regards, > > > > >> > > > > Anton Kalashnikov > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > 10.02.2020, 12:07, "Alexey Goncharuk" < > > > > alexey.goncha...@gmail.com > > > > >> >: > > > > >> > > > >> Folks, > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> I think there is a consensus here, but we did not remove > > > IGFS > > > > >> > > neither in > > > > >> > > > >> 2.7 nor in 2.8, did we? Should we schedule a > corresponding > > > > ticket > > > > >> > > for 2.9? > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
