I've removed Initial Query from the POC and IEP (left a note there about the decision).
Since there are no other comments and concerns, I'll move on with the final implementation. On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 4:14 PM Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org> wrote: > Igor, Alex, > > I was aware of the duplicates issue with the initial query, but I did not > give it a second thought. > > Now I see that Vladimir was right - Initial query seems to be pointless, > since users can > achieve the same by simply invoking the regular query. > > I will remove Initial Query from the IEP and POC next week if there are no > objections by then. > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 3:58 PM Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Igor, Pavel, >> >> Here is discussion about removal: [1] >> >> [1] : >> >> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/ContinuousQueryWithTransformer-implementation-questions-2-td21418i20.html#a22041 >> >> пт, 10 июл. 2020 г. в 17:44, Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org>: >> >> > Can not find proposal to remove them, so maybe it was not on devlist, >> > but here is discussion about the problem: [1] >> > >> > [1] - >> > >> > >> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Continuous-queries-and-duplicates-td39444.html >> > >> > Best Regards, >> > Igor >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 3:27 PM Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > > What's about "stop" message? How can user unsubscribe from receiving >> > > notifications? >> > > OP_RESOURCE_CLOSE is used for that. I've updated the IEP in an >> attempt to >> > > make this cleaner. >> > > >> > > > I've seen discussions on removing initial query from continuous >> > queries >> > > Interesting, I'm not aware of this. Can you please link those >> > discussions? >> > > >> > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 2:04 PM Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Pavel, >> > > > >> > > > What's about "stop" message? How can user unsubscribe from receiving >> > > > notifications? >> > > > >> > > > Also, I believe I've seen discussions on removing initial query from >> > > > continuous queries, >> > > > as there are not any guarantees about getting consistent results >> with >> > > them. >> > > > Should >> > > > we avoid adding them in thin protocol maybe? It would also simplify >> > > > protocol a lot. >> > > > >> > > > Best Regards, >> > > > Igor >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:39 PM Pavel Tupitsyn < >> ptupit...@apache.org> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Igniters, >> > > > > >> > > > > Let's discuss Thin Client Continuous Queries, >> > > > > I've prepared an IEP [1] and a PoC [2]. >> > > > > >> > > > > [1] >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-50%3A+Thin+Client+Continuous+Queries >> > > > > >> > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7966 >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
