Hello!

I will assist with checking on Linux if you would contribute a patch.
Please start with a ticket (or even an IEP maybe?)

Regards,
-- 
Ilya Kasnacheev


вт, 26 мая 2020 г. в 16:47, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>:

> Guys, I will certainly thoroughly test my fix not only unices, but on
> windows too.
> And I will describe it very thoroughly.
>
> When I was C++ developer (more than 10 years ago), I have not any trouble
> at all with CMake and Visual Studio 2005.
> Everything works and works good. Moreover, you can build with NMake,
> msbuild and generate solutions for development.
>
> I suppose, for CI purposes, using NMake is a way better, than use vs
> solutions.
>
> вт, 26 мая 2020 г. в 16:42, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hello, Igor.
> >
> > > Nikolay, removing support for a certain build system is a breaking
> > change.
> >
> > No, it’s not.
> > Why do you think so?
> >
> > Development environment and build system is a subject to change in any
> > project.
> > We can drop or add support of any build system any time we want.
> >
> > > 26 мая 2020 г., в 16:35, Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>
> > написал(а):
> > >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I don't see why we can't get rid of autotools in a minor release,
> > provided
> > > that cmake actually works. Removing native VS support may be a
> different
> > > thing.
> > >
> > > Build system and precise set of dependencies is not a part of public
> API
> > in
> > > my opinion.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > --
> > > Ilya Kasnacheev
> > >
> > >
> > > вт, 26 мая 2020 г. в 16:02, Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > >> Great!
> > >>
> > >> Let's start with creating a TC suite for it.
> > >>
> > >> The only concern I have is that it is one more build system
> > >> to support. Should we get rid of autotools in 3.0?
> > >>
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> Igor
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:44 PM Alexey Kukushkin <
> > >> kukushkinale...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1. I recently completed a cross-IDE (MS Visual Studio & GCC/GDB)
> > Ignite
> > >>> C++ project and CMake in Ignite C++ would save me a day of effort.
> > >>>
> > >>> вт, 26 мая 2020 г. в 12:09, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:02 PM Zhenya Stanilovsky
> > >>>> <arzamas...@mail.ru.invalid> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Ivan huge +1 with your proposal.
> > >>>>> I had some problems with odbc tests building too, looks like cmake
> > >> will
> > >>>>> make it more easy.
> > >>>>>> Hello Igniters.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I’d like to discuss porting build process of Ignite.C++. I think
> > >> that
> > >>>>> there is time to change it.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> *Motivation*
> > >>>>>> Currently, it is hard to build Ignite.C++. Different build process
> > >> for
> > >>>>> windows and linux, lack of building support on Mac OS X (quite
> > >> popular
> > >>> OS
> > >>>>> among developers), absolutely not IDE support, except windows and
> > >> only
> > >>>>> Visual Studio is supported.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> *Suggestion*
> > >>>>>> I’d suggest to migrate to CMake build system. It is very popular
> > >> among
> > >>>>> open source projects, and in Apache Software Foundation too.
> Notable
> > >>>> user:
> > >>>>> Apache Mesos, Apache Zookeeper (C client offers CMake as an
> > >> alternative
> > >>>> to
> > >>>>> autoconf and only option on windows), Apache Kafka (librdkafka -
> > >> C/C++
> > >>>>> client), Apache Thrift. Popular column-oriented database ClickHouse
> > >>> also
> > >>>>> uses CMake.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> CMake is widely supported in many IDE’s on various platforms,
> > >> notably
> > >>>>> Visual Studio, CLion, Xcode, QtCreator, KDevelop.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> *Current status*
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Currently, the most of work is done (see [1]) and tested on Mac
> OS X
> > >>>>> 10.15 (some C++ porting). All tests are run without any flaws,
> > >>> including
> > >>>>> odbc (unixodbc), ssl, thin and thick client, installation, IDE
> > >>>> integration
> > >>>>> (CLion). Next steps is to test linux and windows.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> But full migration isn’t possible without agreement and help of
> > >>>>> community. Even if most of all you agree, migration requires
> > >> additional
> > >>>>> efforts in TC agents tuning and so on (event though test running
> > >> fully
> > >>>>> automated by CMake CTest).
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Lets discuss my proposition and idea.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> [1] -  https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7845
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Best regards,
> > >>> Alexey
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
>

Reply via email to