Hello! Done!
Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey <macrerg...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > I'm proposing to add > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549 (fix iterators/scan > queries for replicated caches) > to 2.8.1. > > Best regards, > Sergey Kosarev. > > > вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat Maitra <saikat.mai...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi, > > > > I observed that we already have release 2.8.1 branch > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1 > > > > In that case we should be ok to merge these 2 open PRs in master to make > it > > available for 2.9.0 release. > > > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240 > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227 > > > > Can you please review and confirm? > > > > Regards, > > Saikat > > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > I support Nikolay Izhikov as the release manager of 2.8.1 Apache > > > Ignite release. Since no one else of committers, PMCs expressed a > > > desire to lead this release I think we can close this question and > > > focus on the release scope and dates. > > > > > > > > > Ivan, > > > > > > You helped me configuring TC.Bot that time, can you please help again > > > and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for guard under TC.Bot [1]? We should > > > start collecting TC statistics for the release branch as early as > > > possible. > > > > > > > > > [1] https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html > > > > > > On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48, Taras Ledkov <tled...@gridgain.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I propose to add the issue [1] related to SQL query execution to this > > > scope. > > > > > > > > We had omitted this case and Ignite 2.8 contains serious SQL issue: > > > > cursor of a local query is not thread-safe. > > > > It is root cause of several SQL issue, e.g. JDBC thin client cannot > > > > execute query from replicated cache, > > > > PME may hang after execute such queries from JDBC thin, etc. > > > > > > > > [1]. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800 > > > > > > > > On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda wrote: > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable and we already keep adding critical > > > issues > > > > > to the working queue, let's settle on the release time frames and > > > decide > > > > > who will be a release manager. This is the time proposed by Maxim > > and, > > > > > personally, I concur with such a schedule: > > > > > > > > > > - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020 > > > > > - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020 > > > > > - Voting Date: April 27, 2020 > > > > > - Release Date: May 1, 2020 > > > > > > > > > > Do we agree on this time? Is there anybody who ready to drive the > > > release > > > > > as a release manager? > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM Sergey Antonov < > > > antonovserge...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Folks, > > > > >> > > > > >> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12774 Transaction hangs after too > many > > > open > > > > >> files NIO exception [1] to ignite-2.8.1 scope. > > > > >> > > > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774 > > > > >> > > > > >> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>: > > > > >> > > > > >>> Folks, > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2] branch under TC.Bot protection [1]? > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> [1] https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html > > > > >>> [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1 > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32, Alexey Goncharuk > > > > >>> <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>>> Folks, > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> I've walked through all the commits to master since 2.8 branch > was > > > cut > > > > >>> and > > > > >>>> filtered some tickets that in my opinion are worth including to > > > 2.8.1 > > > > >>>> release below (note that they are ready end the effort of > > including > > > > >> them > > > > >>> to > > > > >>>> the release should be low as long as there are no implicit > > > dependencies > > > > >>>> between tickets). Please share your opinion on whether we should > > > > >> include > > > > >>>> them to the 2.8.1. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation refactoring > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO query is failing on Ignite client node > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of partition's states can stuck when > rebalance > > > > >>>> completed during exchange > > > > >>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on unstable topology caused by > partition > > > > >>>> reservation > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential race on MapResult close. > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL) rebalance can start on a cleared > > > > >> partition > > > > >>> if > > > > >>>> some baseline node leaves the cluster and then joins back. > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in > > GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl > > > may > > > > >>>> accumulate a huge number of eviction callbacks > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record type in marshalled > > mode > > > > >>> during > > > > >>>> iteration > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause NullPointerException during IO > > > > >> message > > > > >>>> processing if security is enabled > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a historical one > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of last server event can > > be > > > > >> wiped > > > > >>>> from history > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown by > > ExchangeLatchManager > > > > >>> during > > > > >>>> cache creation > > > > >>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency issues for atomic and mixed > tx-atomic > > > > >> cache > > > > >>>> groups. > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big cache which is not only cache in > cache > > > > >> group > > > > >>>> causes IgniteOOME > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state when non-indexed > > columns > > > > >> are > > > > >>>> dropped > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a BinaryObject's field > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node by consistent ID > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in WAL doesn't work > with > > > > >> segment > > > > >>>> compaction > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx desync during recovery on near node > left. > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by other nodes switch > their > > > state > > > > >>> to > > > > >>>> MOVING due to counter difference on node join. > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition is evicted then > owned > > > > >> again > > > > >>>> and historically rebalanced > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency between cache data and indexes when > > cache > > > > >>>> operation is interrupted > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page difference output in > PageMemoryTracker > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously generated thread dumps in failure > > > processor > > > > >>> slow > > > > >>>> down the whole system > > > > >>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during purges by expiration: Unknown page > type > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> BR, Sergey Antonov > > > > >> > > > > -- > > > > Taras Ledkov > > > > Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com > > > > > > > > > >
