Agree - this is basically what I meant. We should resolve it as 2.9 and then form the scope for 2.8.1. Sorry for the confusion.
пн, 2 мар. 2020 г. в 19:26, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>: > Folks, > > > I think the issue should be merged into the master branch first (2.9). > I pinned some critical issues to 2.8.1 which are, from my point, have > to be fixed in 2.8 but still not due to lack of contributions. Since > the scope for 2.8.1 is not fixed and not discussed yet the goal for > such tasks is 2.9. > > > On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 19:20, Alexey Goncharuk > <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Ivan, > > > > Unless I missed something, we do not even have a scope for 2.8.1. As I > > recall, there were some important changes that did not get to 2.8.0. As > the > > voting is close to finish, I think we can kick off a discussion for > 2.8.1? >
