Denis,
We still need additional work over the whole documentation, not only resolving comments for the new monitoring feature [2]. Here is the full list of issues related to documentation - [1]. Examples need to be extended too. For instance, - suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions - default Ignite work dir location (changed in 2.7.6 right?) - baseline auto-adjustment feature [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Unresolveddocumentationtasks [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12408 On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 00:48, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Maxim, > > Do you have any understanding in regards to documentation readiness? I do > remember Nikolay was creating a page for the new metrics framework and > Artem stepped in as a reviewer. But not sure if that supposedly the largest > item is completed and if the other pages need to be updated. > > - > Denis > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 6:19 AM Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Igniters, > > > > > > Current the 2.8 release status > > > > > > 1. The PR with RELEASE_NOTES fully updated [1]. > > > > 2. Previously mentioned performance drop has not been confirmed. Run > > many times in different environments. All test results within the > > margin of error. > > In-memory, putAll, 4 nodes, 1 client > > IgnitePutAllBenchmark: +1% > > IgnitePutAllTxBenchmark: -6% > > > > 3. Waiting for the vote completion > > (Allow or prohibit a joint use of @deprecated and @IgniteExperimental) > > > > 4. Mark MVCC with IgniteExperimental [2]. > > > > 5. Wait for ML examples to be fixed [3]. > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7367/files > > [2] > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Mark-MVCC-with-IgniteExperimental-td45669.html > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12657 > > > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 15:08, Ivan Bessonov <bessonov...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hello Igniters, > > > > > > I'd like to add one more fix to the release: [1] > > > It adds versioning to internal classes of distributed metastorage > > component. > > > Without this fix it would be much harder to update these classes without > > > breaking binary compatibility. > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12638 > > > > > > ср, 5 февр. 2020 г. в 22:33, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > Ivan, > > > > > > > > > Should not we state in release notes what new experimental API was > > added? > > > > > > > > I think we should. Will do. > > > > Just not to miss anything that we should mark with > > > > @IgniteExperimental: Consistency Check [1], Monitoring [2] anything > > > > else? > > > > > > > > > As Flink integration was moved to external repository how Ignite 2.8 > > > > users will be able to use that integration? > > > > > > > > Since ignite-extension has a separate release cycle (right?), it is > > > > better to release ignite-extension rather than cherry-pick this change > > > > back to 2.8. I also think it is not a blocker for the release, but we > > > > should do our best make the first ignite-extension release as earlier > > > > as possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10663 > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11848 > > > > > > > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 22:07, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Maxim, > > > > > > > > > > A couple of questions: > > > > > 1. We added an annotation to designate experimental API. Should not > > we > > > > > state in release notes what new experimental API was added? Perhaps > > in > > > > > a separate block. > > > > > 2. As Flink integration was moved to external repository how Ignite > > > > > 2.8 users will be able to use that integration? > > > > > > > > > > ср, 5 февр. 2020 г. в 21:21, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've prepared RELEASE_NOTES pull-request [1] to the 2.8 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently, IEP-35 monitoring issues are not included in this PR. > > Will > > > > > > do it soon. > > > > > > Please, take a look. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7367/files > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 14:38, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me share the current status of the release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. > > > > > > > Waiting for the issues [1] [2] (discussed previously this > > thread) to > > > > > > > be tested by TC.Bot and merged to the 2.8 release branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. > > > > > > > Only 2 release BLOCKER issues left. I'm planning to move these > > issues > > > > > > > to 2.8.1 release. > > > > > > > The issue [4] (Error during purges by expiration: Unknown page > > type) > > > > > > > will be covered by [1] [2]. > > > > > > > The issue [3] (Apache Ignite Cluster(Amazon S3 Based Discovery) > > Nodes > > > > > > > getting down) probably require additional info to reproduce the > > > > issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. > > > > > > > A potential performance drop on `putAll` operations on an > > in-memory > > > > > > > cluster (see [5] for details). > > > > > > > I'll try to reproduce in another test environment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will keep you posted. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12593 > > > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12594 > > > > > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12398 > > > > > > > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12489 > > > > > > > [5] > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Benchmarks(LATEST) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 15:02, Alexey Goncharuk > > > > > > > <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds good, will do! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Ivan Pavlukhin > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sincerely yours, > > > Ivan Bessonov > >
