Some more thoughts.

I think we can try out a first release and decide if everything is ok
along the way. I suppose that we should run tests with supported
Ignite versions (perhaps not all) and provide results. And finally
there will be a release vote.

Best regards,
Ivan Pavlukhin

пт, 7 февр. 2020 г. в 19:43, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
>
> Folks, have we agreed on the release process? Saikat, could you point all
> of us to a related discussion. If my memory doesn't fail me Alex Goncharuk
> also wanted to step in before we do the first release.
>
> -
> Denis
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 8:02 AM Saikat Maitra <saikat.mai...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Nikolay, Ivan, Denis
> >
> > I think we can release for spring boot autoconfigure module.
> >
> >
> > I will also go ahead and make release for flink ext.
> >
> > I have pending PR for flume and zeromq, if I can get review and approval I
> > can go ahead and merge and release these modules as well.
> >
> > Regards
> > Saikat
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 2:06 AM, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for clarification.
> > >
> > > Igniters, I will proceed with the release in the next few days if there
> > is
> > > no objections on it.
> > >
> > > > 7 февр. 2020 г., в 10:57, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>
> > > написал(а):
> > > >
> > > > Hi Nikolay,
> > > >
> > > > In fact I did not mean anything supernatural. A scheme you mentioned
> > > >> I thought we just release module with the 1.0.0 version and specify
> > > supported Ignite version somewhere in the documentation.
> > > > sounds fine to me.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Ivan Pavlukhin
> > > >
> > > > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 15:00, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hello, Ivan.
> > > >>
> > > >>> As usual we need to decide about versioning and a correspondence to
> > > Ignite versions
> > > >>> As we are going to have a separate release cycle I can imagine an
> > > independent versioning scheme with a range of supported Ignite versions.
> > > >>
> > > >> Please, clarify, what do you mean?
> > > >> Do you have any idea how it should be implemented?
> > > >>
> > > >> I thought we just release module with the 1.0.0 version and specify
> > > supported Ignite version somewhere in the documentation.
> > > >>
> > > >>> 6 февр. 2020 г., в 11:15, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>
> > > написал(а):
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Nikolay,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thank you for driving it! It is great to establish this process in
> > > >>> practice earlier because it seems that we need to release a Flink
> > > >>> integration soon because Ignite 2.8 is going to be released without
> > > >>> that integration bundled.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> As usual we need to decide about versioning and a correspondence to
> > > >>> Ignite versions. As we are going to have a separate release cycle I
> > > >>> can imagine an independent versioning scheme with a range of
> > supported
> > > >>> Ignite versions.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Also I think it is a good idea to update ignite-extensions README on
> > > >>> GitHub and provide a link to relevant TC jobs.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Best regards,
> > > >>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ср, 5 февр. 2020 г. в 17:44, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Alex, did you have a chance to review Saikat’s changes related to
> > the
> > > >>>> extensions repository organization and release approach?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Denis
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2020, Nikolay Izhikov <
> > nizhi...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> We don't have a release process for newly created ignite-extensions
> > > >>>>> modules.
> > > >>>>> I want to release two modules:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> * ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigure
> > > >>>>> * ignite-client-spring-boot-autoconfigure
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Let's discuss it.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Any objections to it?
> > > >>>>> What should be done before release?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> -
> > > >>>> Denis
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >

Reply via email to